0
Yes, a satellite orbiting a planet, such as Earth, is in an inertial reference frame.
This is puzzling because the satellite is not moving in a straight line. Doesn't that mean it is accelerated to curve its path circling the Earth? The only reliable way of determining whether or not you are in an inertial frame is by detection of a force that prevents you from floating freely in your space ship. If you are floating freely, as you would in the orbiting International Space Station (a big satellite), then you are in an inertial frame. If you are able to sit or stand unrestrained in your space ship then the ship is undergoing some sort of an acceleration. This really has nothing to do with your trajectory since, for example, you can speed up or slow down on a "straight line" and feel the force of acceleration. The only straight line that can be used to define an inertial frame is the geodesic path described in Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is not likely to appear on a map A poles B legend C longitude lines D satellites E cardinal direction?
Satellites. They move, so they cannot be printed on a map. Additionally, "satellites" is the only option that physically exists; the other choices are concepts, not objects.
What are the name of satellites of planet Mercury?
There are no known satellites of Mercury.
How does a satellites move in space when its vacuum?
well space is like a vacuum you cant escape it and sound wave do not travel in space but space isn't literally a vacuum so they move by rockets and the gravity of earth
How do satellites triangulate?
Triangulation of satellites requires three satellites that bank of one another simultaneously.
Are moons satellites?
Yes but they are called natural satellites
Is earth an inertial frame of reference?
No, the Earth is not an inertial frame of reference due to its rotation and revolution around the Sun. In an inertial frame, objects move in straight lines at constant speeds unless acted upon by external forces, which is not the case for objects on Earth due to these motions.
what is an inertial frame of reference?
An inertial frame of reference is a frame in which a body either at rest or in uniform motion will remain at rest or continue to move in a straight line at constant speed unless acted upon by an external force. It is a frame that moves at a constant velocity with no acceleration.
What is the difference between inertial reference frame and absolute reference frame?
An inertial reference frame is a frame of reference in which an object not subject to external forces moves at a constant velocity. An absolute reference frame is a hypothetical frame of reference that is fixed in space and in which all other frames of reference are measured. Inertial reference frames are relative to each other, while the absolute reference frame provides a universal standard of motion.
Difference between inertial frame of reference and non-inertial frame of reference?
An inertial frame of reference is a frame in which Newton's first law holds true, meaning an object remains at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by a force. In contrast, a non-inertial frame of reference is one that is accelerating or rotating, causing fictitious forces to appear in the equations of motion.
Is the inertial reference frame an absolute reference frame?
No, an inertial reference frame is not an absolute reference frame. It is a frame of reference in which an object either remains at rest or moves with constant velocity in a straight line, but it is not considered absolute as its motion can be affected by external forces.
What will be happen when a moving body collides with a stationary body in a complete inertial frame?
Actually this question is related to Newton's first law of motion. Newton says that in inertial frame or in space where there is zero gravity a moving body will always move and a stationary body will always Note: This answer is obviously incomplete.
Does angular momentum requires an inertial frame?
Yes, angular momentum is conserved in an inertial frame of reference, where Newton's laws of motion hold true. In a non-inertial frame, the concept of angular momentum becomes more complex due to the presence of fictitious forces.
Why newton's laws are not valid in non inertial frame of reference?
newtons laws are always valid in non inertial frames
When observed in an inertial frame of reference all objects that experience no forces will appear to?
When observed in an inertial frame of reference, all objects that experience no external forces will either remain at rest or move with a constant velocity. This is described by Newton's first law of motion, often referred to as the law of inertia.
Is earth inertial or noninertial frame?
Earth is considered a noninertial frame of reference due to its rotation and orbital motion. Inertial frames are frames of reference where Newton's laws of motion hold true without the influence of external forces, which is not the case for Earth.
Is the twin paradox possible if the space twin was in an inertial frames of reference?
No, if both persons are in inertial frames of reference the situation is completely symmetric so the 'paradox' does not occur. Also note that it is not really a paradox because general relativity has a conclusive answer to what happens to the twins. It is; however, not possible to set up a twin paradox-like situation with neither twin never leaving an inertial frame. This is because if they want to move apart, and come back again, they need to accelerate somehow, and the act of acceleration causes you to leave an inertial frame.
What is the most common frame of reference?
The most common frame of reference in physics is the inertial frame of reference, where an object is considered to be at rest or moving with constant velocity. Observers in different inertial frames will agree on the laws of physics governing the motion of objects.
