The Earth's core contains many radioactive elements within its core that emit warmth as they decay, keeping the core of the Earth hot and heating it from within. Meanwhile, the sun is a product of the nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium and its rays warm the Earth's crust from outside.
Might try Krylon Fusion aerosol paint. Specially designed for plastic. Have used on a Cherokee plastic grill.
nuclear fusion is not a natural occurrence, it is when two atoms are fused together
Yes, it is possible (beam target fusion).
It has to be at hundreds of millions of degrees kelvin, before a fusion reaction between deuterium and tritium will start
Experiments in fusion have used deuterium and tritium, both isotopes of hydrogen
That's because of where each of these processes occur. There is no nuclear fusion inside of Earth. There is probably a small amount of radioactive decay in the Sun, but the power produced by it is insignificant, compared to the huge amount of power produced by nuclear fusion.
No. The products of nuclear fusion are not radioactive.
Yes, fusion does not create long-lived radioactive waste like fission does.
Yes, fusion does not produce long-lived radioactive waste like nuclear fission.
Nuclear fusion does not create long-lasting radioactive waste like nuclear fission does. However, some materials used in fusion reactors may become radioactive and need to be handled carefully.
Yes, nuclear fusion produces some radioactive waste, but it is generally less than what is produced by nuclear fission.
Fusion is preferred over fission because it produces more energy with less radioactive waste and is less prone to accidents. Fusion reactions use isotopes of hydrogen, which are abundant and non-radioactive, as fuel. Additionally, fusion does not produce long-lived radioactive waste like fission reactions do.
No, spontaneous fusion is not a form of radioactive decay. Spontaneous fusion occurs when two light atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing energy in the process. In contrast, radioactive decay is the process by which an unstable atomic nucleus emits radiation or particles to become more stable.
No, the parent element in a nuclear reaction is not always radioactive. While many parent isotopes are indeed radioactive and decay into stable or unstable daughter isotopes, there are also stable isotopes that can undergo nuclear reactions without being radioactive themselves. For example, stable isotopes can be involved in nuclear reactions such as neutron capture or fusion, but they do not decay over time like radioactive isotopes.
Most (but not all) fusion products are non-radioactive. Virtually all fission products are strongly radioactive beta or gamma emitters.
creating fusion bombs
In my understanding, this is because a fusion reactor reacts deuterium to produce helium, which is not radioactive, whereas a fission uses uranium or plutonium, for example, which may react to form various radioactive isotopes. A fusion reactor may contain small quantities of tritium, in which case a radioactive isotope of hydrogen may be produced, but given that the majority of reactions occurring involve solely the deuterium, there is less radioactive waste produced.