0
Archaeological sources are the primary fact or evidence supporting a theory or belief.
- A source could be written testimony of an event, occasion or ceremony, recorded at the same time (for example carvings on the wall of a tomb, the Bayeux Tapestry etc).
- A source can be physical collected evidence that can be scientifically validated, such a bones which can be carbon dated.
- A secondary source would be a second hand account of an event, while these are still considered valuable (especially if there are a number of independent ones that can corroborate an event) they are always open to interpretation. A classic example of this is The Iliad, by Homer, which recorded second hand accounts of the Trojan War and wove them into a story.
In modern history it could be a photo, film, recording or even an interview.
What else can I help you with?
Distinguish between archaeological and literary sources?
Archaeological sources are physical objects or remains (such as artifacts, structures, and ancient tools) that provide evidence of past human societies, while literary sources are written texts that offer insights into historical events, beliefs, and traditions. Archaeological sources are tangible, while literary sources are more interpretive and can provide details on culture and societal norms not typically found in artifacts.
What are the different archaeological sources of India?
Archaeological sources in India include artifacts, inscriptions, monuments, coins, and buildings dating back to different historical periods. These sources provide crucial insights into the material culture, societal structures, and religious practices of ancient Indian civilizations. Excavations at sites like Mohenjo-Daro, Harappa, and Hampi have yielded valuable archaeological evidence that helps in understanding India's rich cultural heritage.
How do archaeological sources help in reconstructing in Indian history?
Archaeological sources such as artifacts, ruins, inscriptions, and human remains provide material evidence that helps in understanding the chronology, culture, and lifestyle of ancient Indian civilizations. By analyzing these sources, historians can reconstruct the economic, social, and religious aspects of Indian history, supplementing and enriching the information available from textual sources. Additionally, archaeological findings can offer insights into trade networks, technology, urban planning, and artistic achievements, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of India's past.
Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources why?
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
What three tool do historians use to help them answer quistions from the past?
If we don't study and make an attempt to understand why it happened, how it happened and the outcome result, we will be destined to repeat it. Certain times in history absolutely do not need to be revisited.
What are the types of archaeological sources?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
How are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources?
nhi pata mujhe>>!!
Distinguish between archaeological and literary sources?
Archaeological sources are physical objects or remains (such as artifacts, structures, and ancient tools) that provide evidence of past human societies, while literary sources are written texts that offer insights into historical events, beliefs, and traditions. Archaeological sources are tangible, while literary sources are more interpretive and can provide details on culture and societal norms not typically found in artifacts.
What are the sources for information on the ancient Hebrews?
old testament and archaeological questions
Debate on literary sources are more useful than archelogical sources for writing history?
literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources for writing history
What are the different types of archaeological source?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What are the two archaeological sources in ancient Indian history?
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
What are the different archaeological sources of India?
Archaeological sources in India include artifacts, inscriptions, monuments, coins, and buildings dating back to different historical periods. These sources provide crucial insights into the material culture, societal structures, and religious practices of ancient Indian civilizations. Excavations at sites like Mohenjo-Daro, Harappa, and Hampi have yielded valuable archaeological evidence that helps in understanding India's rich cultural heritage.
How do archaeological sources help in reconstructing in Indian history?
Archaeological sources such as artifacts, ruins, inscriptions, and human remains provide material evidence that helps in understanding the chronology, culture, and lifestyle of ancient Indian civilizations. By analyzing these sources, historians can reconstruct the economic, social, and religious aspects of Indian history, supplementing and enriching the information available from textual sources. Additionally, archaeological findings can offer insights into trade networks, technology, urban planning, and artistic achievements, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of India's past.
How accurate is carbon dating in determining the age of archaeological artifacts?
Carbon dating is a reliable method for determining the age of archaeological artifacts, but it is not always 100 accurate due to potential sources of error.
Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources why?
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
What are the sources of modern history?
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
