answersLogoWhite

0

There are many physical and cultural differences between Homo habilis and Homo erectus.

Diet: Homo erectus had a much larger proportion of meat in its diet than Homo habilis. Also, H. habilis had stronger teeth so it could eat tougher foods. They both ate their veggies and bone marrow.

Fire: H. erectus discovered fire and used it for hunting, fighting, scaring animals, cooking, and making tools, while H. habilis did not have control of fire.

Tools: Homo erectus created far more sophisticated stone tools than Homo habilis, and is most well known for its sophisticated biface handaxes. They both had spears and stone tools.

Distribution: Homo habilis is only found in Africa, while Homo erectus has a much wider distribution not only Africa but also spreading across areas of Europe and Asia.

Morphology: Homo erectus had a proportionally larger brain than Homo habilis, and smaller teeth. See related links below for modern reconstructions of these species physical appearance.

Posture: H. erectus walked upright, much like the modern human. However, H. habilis stooped over and did not walk upright.

Erectus means upright and habilis means handyman.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the plural form of Homo habilis Homo erectus and Homo sapiens?

The plural form of Homo habilis is Homo habilis, the plural form of Homo erectus is Homo erectus, and the plural form of Homo sapiens is Homo sapiens.


What are the stages of hominids?

australopithecine, hominids, homo habilis, homo erectus, and then homo sapiens


Did homo habilis stand upright?

Yes, Homo habilis is believed to have been capable of walking on two legs or bipedalism. This species is considered a transitional form between earlier apelike ancestors and later species of the genus Homo.


What came after australopithecines?

Homo Habilis, then Homo erectus, Neanderthals, and Cro-Magnon


Are homo habilis more like homo erectus or more like the australopithecines?

Homo habilis is more like Homo erectus than the australopithecines. Homo habilis is considered part of the genus Homo due to its more advanced traits such as increased brain size and tool use, while australopithecines are an earlier group of hominins with more primitive features.


What comes after homo habilis?

After Homo habilis comes Homo erectus, which lived around 1.9 million to 143,000 years ago. Homo erectus was known for its advanced tool-making capabilities and ability to control fire.


What is the correct order in which early humans appeared?

Ardipithecus Ramidus, Australopithecus Ramidus, Australopithecus Afarensis (Lucy), Australopithecus Afracanus, Australopithecus Robustus/Homo Habilis, Homo-Erectus, Homo-Ergaster, Homo-Sapien, Homo-Sapien Neanderthal, Homo-Sapien Sapien.


What are homo habilis and homo erectus examples of?

Homo habilis and Homo erectus are examples of hominins, which are extinct species of the genus Homo that are closely related to modern humans. They are part of our evolutionary history and are considered important in understanding the development of early humans.


Is the Homo Erectus the same thing as the Homo Ergaster?

Homo erectus and Homo ergaster are two distinct species within the Homo genus. Homo ergaster is considered to be an African species that eventually evolved into Homo erectus, which was more widespread and inhabited both Africa and parts of Asia. Homo ergaster is generally seen as a transitional species between Homo habilis and Homo erectus.


What came first homo habilis or homo erectus?

Erectus is the first supposed humanoid species that was walking on 2 legs. It lived between 40.000 years and 1.8 million yers ago. Homo Sapiens is the human species of today, and is not considered to be much more than approx 200.000 years old. Regards.


When did homo erectus transform?

Homo Habilis didn't just transform into Homo Erectus. To answer your question, it was around 1.5-1.6 million years ago ;)


Are homo habilis the oldest?

homo habilis are the earliest people who wandered around looking for food.