The Assyrian empire ages before the Roman empire ever was recognized, the Assyrian empire had invented the first war horse chariot that defeated any enemies, the Romans would have no chance. Especially, the Assyrians defeated enemies with very small number of soldiers. When the Romans fought, they had to fight with hundreds of soldiers to even match their enemies. Assyrians for sure would win.
In this hypothetical Q if the armies of the two Empires would meet the Assyrians were expected to win since their armed forces were very well trained and had superiority of strategies, armaments, tactics and technics.
Greek & Roman armies :D
The people who commanded the armies and ran the legal system were called Praetors. They were appointed by the Roman government.
Cleopatra knew her armies could never defeat the Roman armies, so she defended the independence of Egypt by making alliances, first with Julius Caesar and then with Marc Antony.
When Caesar said "Veni, Vidi, Vici", he actually was not fighting Pompey or even Romans. He said it after the battle of Zela, in modern Turkey, where he had defeated Pharnaces II of Pontus, a kingdom on the shores of the Black Sea. Caesar's experienced Roman army beat the Pontic army so quickly that it seemed to Caesar like a pushover. This message was sent to the Roman senate to announce his victory.
Sandals helped to prevent foo disease in the hot climate of the Mediterranean by airing the feet.
Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.Ashur was not a god in the Roman pantheon. He was an Assyrian god. As he was the head of the Assyrian pantheon, he could be loosely compared to Jupiter.
Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.
Soisson was a battle field since the Roman Empire times. In the last battle of Soissons that happened in 1918 between the American and German armies the casualties of the Germans reached the 12.000 soldiers. Other battles of Soissons are those of 923, 718 and 486 CE.
There were several dominant Roman armies in history. These Roman armies include the Romany Army of the Mid-Repubic, Imperial Roman Army, Middle Byzantine Army, and Komnenian Byzantine Army.
Greek & Roman armies :D
NO
Hannibal was a Carthaginian General. He gained many famous victories against Roman armies and their allies during second Punic war. He was finally defeated by Roman general Scipio Africanus in battle of Zama.
You cannot compare ancient armies to modern ones because food technology and transportation improvements have allowed for larger fielded and standing armies.The Roman army of the past would be very smallcomparedto the industrial global armiesof today or even the professional standing armies of the late colonial times.In Ancient times (before the middle ages) the Roman Empire did field some of the largest armies and had one of the largest standing military of its era.
Brutus killed himself after the final battle because it was the honorable thing for a defeated Roman commander to do. People seem to forget that Brutus and Cassius were leaders of armies, they were generals at the time of their defeat.
lots of things
The Battle of Actium was the definitive clash of two Romans for supreme power. Although the war was nominally against Cleopatra, it was actually a civil war between the forces of Octavian and the forces of Antony.
No.