0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Judy
Steve
BeauAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why were Inca roads so important?
Inca roads were important for several reasons. Firstly, they facilitated trade and communication across the vast Inca Empire, enabling the movement of goods and information. Secondly, they played a crucial role in the administrative control of the empire, helping the Inca rulers maintain their authority and collect tribute from different regions. Lastly, the roads were used for military purposes, allowing for the rapid mobilization of troops and aiding in the expansion and defense of the empire.
Why was the Persian standing army an important factor in Persia's rapid growth?
The Persian Empire stretched from Asia Minor to India, and included many conquered nations. A strong army was important to maintaining the Persian Empire's power for many reasons. Firstly, the army helped to conquer to new lands for the empire. Secondly, they helped deter any possible uprisings or revolutions among the conquered nations. Thirdly, they helped maintain the peace throughout the empire.
What problems did Romans face in the 100s and 200s?
In the second century, the Roman Empire did not face many problems. There was political stability and the economy of the empire, which had developed thriving trading networks, was doing well. During what historians call the Crisis of the 3rd Century, the Romans faced continuous invasions at very distant points along the vast frontiers of their empire. The army managed to repel them, but came under great strain and became overstretched. This led to a period of military anarchy. Many of the emperors were military commanders who had been proclaimed emperors by their troops. There was a rapid turnover of emperors. Many emperors were murdered, some of whom were killed even by their own troops. There were also 35 usurpers who tried to seize the imperial title or parts of the empire. There was also a deep economic crisis caused by hyperinflation.
What are the Compare and contrast Alexander the great and Chandragupta?
Alexander the Great and Chandragupta Maurya were significant leaders in their respective regions, with contrasting approaches to empire-building. Alexander, a Macedonian king, is known for his rapid conquests across Persia and into India, spreading Hellenistic culture. In contrast, Chandragupta, the founder of the Maurya Empire, established a centralized and bureaucratic state in India, focusing on unifying the subcontinent. While both leaders left lasting legacies, Alexander's empire fragmented after his death, whereas Chandragupta's dynasty laid the groundwork for a more enduring imperial structure.
How might this have the incas t conquer such a large empire?
The Incas were able to conquer a vast empire through a combination of military prowess, advanced organization, and effective governance. They utilized a well-trained army equipped with superior weaponry and tactics, allowing them to defeat larger, less organized forces. Additionally, the Incas established a network of roads and communication systems that facilitated rapid troop movement and resource distribution. Their ability to integrate conquered peoples through diplomacy and the imposition of the Inca culture helped maintain control over their expansive territory.
