0
Inductive reasoning takes a specific representative case or facts and then draws generalizations or conclusions from them. Inductive reasoning must be based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence. In other words, the facts you draw on must fairly represent the larger situation or population. Example:
Fair trade agreements have raised the quality of life for coffee producers, so fair trade agreements could be used to help other farmers as well.
In this example the specific case of fair trade agreements with coffee producers is being used as the starting point for the claim. Because these agreements have worked the author concludes that it could work for other farmers as well.
Deductive reasoning begins with a generalization and then applies it to a specific case. The generalization you start with must have been based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence.Example:
Genetically modified seeds have caused poverty, hunger, and a decline in bio-diversity everywhere they have been introduced, so there is no reason the same thing will not occur when genetically modified corn seeds are introduced in Mexico.
In this example the author starts with a large claim, that genetically modified seeds have been problematic everywhere, and from this draws the more localized or specific conclusion that Mexico will be affected in the same way.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is much better an adverb?
There are two words: in this case, much is an adverb, and better may be an adverb.Better is the comparative form of the adjectives good and well, and the adverb well. Much is an adverb of degree modifying better, whether an adjective or adverb.Much by itself can be a noun, e.g. we have risked much.
What do yo soy mucho mejor Que Tu ex mean in English?
I am much better than your ex
What word sounds better much or many?
In my opinion, 'many' sounds better.But technically, they are used for different purposes.If a noun is in singular, we use muchExample: much moneyIf a noun is in plural, we use manyExample: many friends
What does X mean in algebra?
x usually is the unknown that is the factor you have to solve for. It can be any letter but it commonly x. I know this because I had the hardest time in algebra in college. In fact I hated it and really can't remember much more than that. Good Luck I hope you have a much better teacher than I had.
Which is better deal 2 8 inches pizza for 10.99 or one 12 inches pizza for 9.99?
1 12 inch pizza for 9.99 is the better deal. Whether or not we consider the total volume of pizza purchased or just the surface area of pizza (which reflects how much topping there will be) the proportion between the 12 inch and the two 8 inch pizzas (combined) always results in 9:8. So you are getting slightly more pizza with the 12 inch pizza, and it is cheaper, so it is the better deal. Volume = pi * r2 * h. As r2 for the 12 inch pizza = 62 = 36, this is more than 2 * 42 = 32 by the proportion 36:32, which simplifies to 9:8.
True or false Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning?
FALSE
What Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to more certain outcomes compared to inductive reasoning, which involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Deductive reasoning follows a top-down approach, moving from the general to the specific, and is commonly used in mathematics and formal logic to guarantee valid conclusions.
Examples of deductive logic?
This is a concept made more complex than necessary. The two complementary processes of inductive vs. deductive are very simply and easily understood. Consider the number series; 3, 5, 7, 'x', 11, 13, 15, 'y' Simple inspection shows this to be a series of 'odd' numbers, what a mathematician would call 'n+1'. Inductive vs. deductive simply describes the 'type' of reasoning used to determine either 'x' or 'y'. Because it lies 'inside' the other data points, the 'deduction' that 'x'=9 is reached by deductive logic, or, deductive reasoning. We 'deduce' x=9. 'y', on the other hand, lies 'outside' the data, i.e. we don't have a '19' on the 'right' of the 'y' to help us 'deduce' the answer. Much riskier than deductive logic/reasoning, we are forced to use less evidence than we did for the 'x' case. This method is called 'inductive logic/reasoning'. For those who've been exposed to just a little math, this process might seem similar to the dual processes of interpolation and extrapolation...that's because...they are. Identical. Smile, nod and thank those who try to convince you there's 'more to it than THAT!!!'. There isn't. 'Guessing' about anything from 'inside' the data = Deduction/Deductive Reasoning/Deductive Logic = fairly 'safe' procedure = (also) Interpolation. 'Guessing' about anything from 'outside' the data = Induction/Inductive Reasoning/Inductive Logic = slightly riskier procedure = (also) Extrapolation Example of Deductive Logic/Reasoning; Sign directly above two identical unmarked doors, saying 'Customer Restrooms'. Man exits 'left' door. Another man exits 'left' door. Person, with 'hoodie' up, leaves 'left' door. Fourth person, man, exits 'left' door. Deduction? Third person, of unknown gender, exiting 'left' door, was a man. Example of Inductive Logic/Reasoning (same scenario); 'Right' door is the 'ladies'. It really is just that simple.
Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Inductive reasoning takes a specific representative case or facts and then draws generalizations or conclusions from them. Inductive reasoning must be based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence. In other words, the facts you draw on must fairly represent the larger situation or population. Example:Fair trade agreements have raised the quality of life for coffee producers, so fair trade agreements could be used to help other farmers as well.In this example the specific case of fair trade agreements with coffee producers is being used as the starting point for the claim. Because these agreements have worked the author concludes that it could work for other farmers as well.Deductive reasoning begins with a generalization and then applies it to a specific case. The generalization you start with must have been based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence.Example:Genetically modified seeds have caused poverty, hunger, and a decline in bio-diversity everywhere they have been introduced, so there is no reason the same thing will not occur when genetically modified corn seeds are introduced in Mexico.In this example the author starts with a large claim, that genetically modified seeds have been problematic everywhere, and from this draws the more localized or specific conclusion that Mexico will be affected in the same way.
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS A VALID FORM OF EVIDENCE OF DEDUCTIVE REASONING?
A valid deduction is that you posted the question without checking what it said!The question asks about the "following". In those circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that is following?
How much does a biostatician make?
Median Income was 72,600 in 2008. Minimum Education Repuirements is a Master's Degree. Activities: Engages in the development of mathematical theory or apply statistical theory and methods to collect, organize, interpret, and summarize numerical biological data to provide usable information. Skills: Programming, Critical Thinking, Instructing, Active Listening, Writing, Time Management, Mathematics, Systems Evaluation, Active Learning, Complex Problem Solving, Judgment and Decision Making, Coordination, Reading Comprehension, Speaking, Science. Abilities: Speed of Closure, Number Facility, Category Flexibility, Deductive Reasoning, Written Comprehension, Near Vision, Mathematical Reasoning, Information Ordering, Inductive Reasoning, Written Expression
What are the three argument types?
The three argument types are ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos refers to establishing credibility and trustworthiness, logos involves using logic and reasoning to persuade, and pathos involves appealing to emotions to make a connection with the audience.
What is induction in persuasive paragraph and how will i know that it is a persuasive paragraph?
Induction is the opposite of definition. This is not a frequently used method of composing paragraph because it is a much harder way of doing it.In inductive reasoning, your topic is considered as a hypothesis or possible idea. You then test each hypothesis and either prove that it is incorrect or keep it for further testing.
What is an inductive Bible?
Inductive Bible study looks at the Bible for what it says (trying not to read into the text what is not there). So, and inductive Bible is probably a Bible that doesn't add too much extra formatting or information about the Bible beyond what was present in the original.
How can Mysteries to be solved?
it depends on how much time you have to kill!:)
What is an example of hypothetico deductive reasoning?
An example of hypothetico deductive reasoning would be, if you decided to make a toy airplane out of balsa wood. You make the plane, but when you use it, you find it crashes straight to the ground instead of flying. In your mind, you go over each step you took in making the plane as well as all the materials you used. As you're going over the steps one-by-one, you try to work out in your mind exactly what went wrong so you can fix the problem on your next try. Was the wood too thick? is there too much wood at the front on the wings? Were the wings too short? Too long? Is the nose too heavy?
How is philosophy different from the study of subjects as mathematics or other sciences?
Advances in mathematics and most sciences are achieved through the use of the induction, and the scientific method. Philosophy also makes use of induction, but a lot of philosophy involves deductive reasoning and cannot be completely verified; also because of this, pretty much everything in philosophy can be regarded as subjective.
