True
It's true, it's true! Galileo proved it.
Without propellers, jets, or a parachute, an object can't to anything to affect its acceleration when it's falling. "Free fall" means moving under the influence of gravity only, with not even any air resistance. In that situation, on or near the surface of the Earth, acceleration is constant, regardless of the size, shape, mass, weight, or gender of the falling object. That number is 9.8 meters (32.2 feet) per second2 ... known as the acceleration of gravity on Earth.
Yes. An object cannot begin to move without acceleration, but once it's moving, it needs no further acceleration to continue moving.
If acceleration means to increase in speed or pace, then a stationary object is static, without movement, without acceleration. But, if an object is moving at a constant rate, then I suggest acceleration is not present, unless, or until the objects speed increases. Yes, an object with no acceleration may be stationary.
The path of a body not acted on by a force is a path without acceleration, a straight line. A straight line can be a flat line zero velocity or a slant line constant velocity. It cannot be a curved line, acceleration, changing velocity.
It's true, it's true! Galileo proved it.
The acceleration is the same for all objects, as long as air resistance is insignificant. After a while, different objects will have different amount of air resistance. Also, even without air resistance, the speed depends not only on the acceleration, but also on how how long the objects are falling.
Without propellers, jets, or a parachute, an object can't to anything to affect its acceleration when it's falling. "Free fall" means moving under the influence of gravity only, with not even any air resistance. In that situation, on or near the surface of the Earth, acceleration is constant, regardless of the size, shape, mass, weight, or gender of the falling object. That number is 9.8 meters (32.2 feet) per second2 ... known as the acceleration of gravity on Earth.
Strictly speaking, it moves with negative acceleration. The forces of friction and air resistance both act to slow the ball down. If the lane were long enough, the ball would eventually come to a complete stop.
Yes. An object cannot begin to move without acceleration, but once it's moving, it needs no further acceleration to continue moving.
It requires a force to propel an object through air, because of the air resistance. Normally, if there were no air resistance and the object were being propelled on the level with no friction, a constant force would accelerate the object steadily. However, it would require a steady force to propel the object through air even without acceleration. And the faster it went the more resistance it would meet.
If acceleration means to increase in speed or pace, then a stationary object is static, without movement, without acceleration. But, if an object is moving at a constant rate, then I suggest acceleration is not present, unless, or until the objects speed increases. Yes, an object with no acceleration may be stationary.
Yes. Inertia is the resistance of the ball to acceleration. Without intertia, when you kick the ball, the ball wouldn't go anywhere, and would immedialtely fall straight down to the ground and stop immediately.
The path of a body not acted on by a force is a path without acceleration, a straight line. A straight line can be a flat line zero velocity or a slant line constant velocity. It cannot be a curved line, acceleration, changing velocity.
The people who are most likely to get into an MBA program are ones who have work experience. If you try to get into an MBA program without any work experience, regardless of what your degree is in, you are likely to get turned down.
Yes, a body can have aceleration without velocity. Consider sin x the position; cos x is the velocity and -sin x is the acceleration. Here the acceleration negative when x=90 degrees and the velocity is zero at 90 degrees.
It does't