answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because according to today's rules governing the Roman numeral system 49 is XLIX

But the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as IL (-1+50=49)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is roman numeral for 49 not IL?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the number for roman numeral IL?

The Roman numeral of IL = -1+50 => 49


What is the Roman numeral for 49?

The Roman numeral for 49 is 'XLIX'.


What is the roman number of 49?

Nowadays 49 as a Roman numeral is notated as XLIX but the ancient Romans would have probably notated 49 as XXXXVIIII and abridged it to IL


What is the roman numeral for IL?

I is 1 and L is 50. Because the I is before the L you subtract making 49. The proper way of representing 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX.


What is the Romen numeral for 49?

The Roman numeral for 49 is 'XLIX'.


What is the Roman Numeral of 49?

49 = XLIX


What does the roman numeral IL mean?

The L represents 50 in Roman Numerals. This would be one way of saying 49, but most would say it as XLIX.


Why isn't 49 represented by IL in roman numerals?

Because the modern rules now governing the Roman numeral system stipulates that 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX but the ancient Romans would have worked it out on an abacus counting device as XXXXVIIII and then probably abridged it to IL (50-1)


What is xlix in roman numeral?

They represent 49 but the ancient Romans probably wrote out the equivalent of 49 simply as IL (50-1)


What is the number 49 in Roman numerals?

The number 49 is represented by the Roman numeral XLIX


What is the Roman Numeral for 50-1?

ILAdditional Information:-50-1 = 49 and in today's notation in Roman numerals they are: XCIXBut the Romans themselves would have worked out 49 on an abacus counting device as XXXXVIIII and then simplified it to IL (-1+50=49)


Roman numeral for 49?

In today's notation of Roman numerals it is: XLIX. But the Romans themselves would have calculated 49 on an abacus counting board as XXXXVIIII and probably simplified it to IL by placing I to both sides of tne numerals.