Salmon evolved before kangaroos.
Well, All the branches do the law interpretation for their own needs and uses. The interpretation made by Legislative branch is called Authentic Interpretation (interpretation made by the author (of law) itself ) But the most important interpretation is the one made by Courts. Especially the interpretation of Constitutional court (in countries where they exist ) or Supreme Courts.This interpretation is final.
Because he was a fundamentalist Christian. Such people exist today, they think their interpretation of the bible is the only one that is correct. They are too foolish to realise that there are many interpretations possible and all of them are wrong.
it means....
The conservative interpretation of the constitution is: the conservatives believed all that they worked for was being threatened by the government. The pgoressive interpretations believed that the constitution held enlightenment ideals (i.e. liberty) and that the document empowered regular people.
Bill of rights interpretation will be required during dispute. In that case interpretation will be by Judiciary branch which is courts. Could be lower courts or Supreme Court
It is not a correct Roman Numeral. The closest interpretation would be 1995, but the correct nomenclature would be MCMXCV
Homo is the Genus and Sapiens is the Species.
It is necessary for the correct interpretation of the world around us.
It is necessary for the correct interpretation of the world around us.
Selection organization interpretation
Lizards evolved after sponges
That's magnesium fluoride: one magnesium atom, two fluorine atoms.
Repeat the message and your understanding of it back to the sender. If your interpretation is correct, it will be confirmed.
This is rather confusing language, but I am confident that the correct interpretation is "Do the right things correctly".
If anyone knew, then they would be a very famous person. The fact is that there is no known "correct" interpretation of quantum mechanics. Every interpretation has its critics and proponents, and every interpretation has its flaws. The previous answer says there is no known correct interpretation. I would go further, and say that no interpretation is any more valid than any other; all the interpretations are correct. They all give the same predictions, and therefore no experiment can possibly tell us which is "correct".
I'd say no. Greta is probably a Libertarian. Taking pride in the correct interpretation of the Constitution.
Statutes passed by U.S. Congress are typically general in nature. The words used in the statute need to be applied to particular circumstance, cases. Attorneys argue about proper interpretation of statutes. When an appeals court decides which interpretation is correct, that ruling stands as a valid interpretation until a higher court decides otherwise. The interpretation of a statute becomes the law of the land.