0
It makes a claim about the effects of a specific action.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What type of claim an argument of consequence make?
It makes a claim about the effects of a specific action.
What type of claim does an argument of value make?
21!
What type of claim does an argument of interpretation make?
it makes a claim about the meaning of something
What type of claim does an argument of consequences make?
It makes a claim about the effects of a specific action.
What type of claims does an argument of value make?
21!
John's objections to capital punishment carry no weight since he is a convicted felon is a what type of fallacy?
ad hominen (personal attack), which is "attempting to rebut a source's argument or claim or position, on the basis of considerations that logically apply to the source rather than to the argument or claim or position.
What is causal generalization?
Causal generalization is a type of deductive reasoning in which an accepted casual correlation is applied to a specific. This type of argument is commonly used to support a claim of explanation. For example, Oreo cookies make children hungry therefore, these other off brand sandwich cookies will make children hungry.
How can you determine if an argument has weakness in it?
Determine the type of argument and look for potential flaws.
How can you determine if an argument has its weaknesses in it?
Determine the type of argument and look for potential flaws.
What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?
This type of fallacy is called an ad hominem fallacy or ad hominem attack. The Latin term means "to the man" i.e. attacking the speaker rather than refuting the argument. It may also be referred to as an irrelevance.
What does a parallel argument mean?
same type of argument with different view
What type of fallacy does abbeys argument contain?
The argument contains the fallacy of hasty generalization, where Abbey makes a broad generalization about all rich people based on a limited sample size of five individuals. This does not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim.
