Some of the sources cited in Wikipedia on recent Indian history include: Christopher Hibbert: The Great Mutiny (1980); Wilhelm von Pochhammer: India's Road to Nationhood (1981); S.A. Wolpert: Morley and India (!967) -- just to name a few.
Arcological
Some bad sources include: A few pages on Wikipedia Or even magazines like 'OK!' with facts in them.
Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.
You need sources to be able to unravel history.
You could use a material safety data cheet or MSDS or encyclopedia (wikipedia)
No
No
No
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
Answers.com | ReferenceAnswersImagine a Wikipedia page, but above the Wikipedia information, there is also the information provided by a professionally edited encyclopedia or dictionary or atlas, like Britannica or Columbia Encyclopedia. That's what Answers.com's ReferenceAnswers section offers. It has all of Wikipedia's entries, plus (when available) other sources on the same topic, on the same page.
Some good sources to look up information include reputable websites like government websites, educational institutions, research databases, and well-known news organizations. It's also helpful to consult books, scholarly articles, and expert opinions in the relevant field. Additionally, fact-checking websites can be useful for verifying information.
Books about history;encyclopedia, world atlas and stories from people who related to that sector like teachers and professors.