LM doesn't exist as a Roman numeral. The L and the M would never go together in that order. The L before the M would be 950 but 950 as a Roman numeral is CML. C is 100 and M is 1000. Because the C is before the M it subtracts making 900. Then the L (50) is added to make 950.
M is 1000 and L is 50. That would give you 1050.
5
LM is an incorrectly formatted numeral. It's assumed that LM is 1000 - 50 = 950. The correct numeral for 950 would be - CML. Which would be (1000-100)+50=950.
The number 222 can be represented by the Roman numeral CCXXII
The Roman numeral MCMXXV represents the number 1925.
The roman numeral CXCIV is the number 194.
The Roman numeral for the number 1973 is MCMLXXIII
LM is an incorrectly formatted numeral. It's assumed that LM is 1000 - 50 = 950. The correct numeral for 950 would be - CML. Which would be (1000-100)+50=950.
The number 222 can be represented by the Roman numeral CCXXII
The Roman numeral MCMXXV represents the number 1925.
Roman numeral MCMLXXX is the number 1980.
The roman numeral CXCIV is the number 194.
The Roman numeral for the number 1973 is MCMLXXIII
The number 27 as a Roman numeral is XXVII
The Roman Numeral L is equivalent to the number 50.
No Roman numeral exists for zero.
That is not a valid Roman Numeral.
The number 130 is represented by the Roman numeral CXXX
It is the Roman Numeral for the number 6. It is the Roman Numeral for the number 6.