Former is an adjective and formerly is an adverb.
There is a type of puzzle named spot the difference
The difference between "We included it to support" and "We've included it to support" is that the former uses the simple past tense of "include" while the latter uses the present perfect tense, indicating that the action was completed recently and has relevance to the present moment.
The main difference between the two products is their ingredients.
The difference between the two options refers to the distinctions or variations between the choices being compared.
"In compliance with" is commonly used to denote adherence to rules or regulations, while "in compliance to" is less commonly used and may be considered less natural or grammatically correct in this context. It is recommended to use "in compliance with" for clarity and correctness in formal writing.
"Erstwhile" as an ajective is "former" or "previous." As an adverb, it is "formerly." "Ersatz" is an imitation, generally inferior. A mnemonic device is the "...while" -- related to time, hence former.
Former
The difference between will and are going to do is that the former refers to the future or a later day while the latter means implies on the present.
The former is for strings, the later is for numbers (integers).
A current employee is still employed by that particular employer; a former employee is not.
Myan Mar was formerly known as Burma
The city of Taipei was formerly known as Formosa.
The Artist Formerly Known as Me. TAFKAM. Taff Kam.
There is no difference, per se. It's just semantics. Asia was formerly known as the Orient, which is why the two are synonyms.
Answer Ex means in the past, and former means the same thing.
The former is to be looked at, the latter to be listened to.
Thailand Zimbabwe Middle east former Yugoslavia