answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A rope of sand would, of course, be utterly useless for anythinf you wanted a rope for, like tying thirteen things together but a rope (or chain) or iron would be unbreakable and would fetter something which ought to be free. Michael Montagne I think the question is asking why people said that a rope of sand (ie the Articles of Confederation) would be better than a rope of iron (ie the US under the Constitution). Many people were frightened of a strong central government, having just become independent from a monarch. Even thought the Articles of Confederation were not initially very sucessful, many people thought that a strong central government would become dictorial.

User Avatar

Wiki User

18y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did they mean when they said Congress under the Articles of Confederation was like a rope of sand and others said it was better than a rope of iron?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What powers were did the state have by the articles of confederation?

They taxed others Trade And power


What kinds of cooperation did the states agree to under the the articles of confederation?

uphold each others' legal documents


Under the articles of confederation what kinds of cooperation did the states agree to?

uphold each others' legal documents


What Under the articles of confederation what kinds of cooperation did the states agree to?

uphold each others' legal documents


What document was the precursor to the US Constitution?

Several documents were important to the writing of the US Constitution. For example, the Magna Carta, The Articles of Confederation, the Flushing Remonstrance of 1657, The Spirit of the Laws by Montesquieu, John Locke's Two Treatises of Government and Edward Coke's Institutes of the Laws of England.


Which state did not want to sign the Articles of Confederation if the others did not give up their land claims?

All states ratified the document


What kind of government did the Articles Of Confederation set up?

Under the Articles of Confederation, each state sent delegates to Congress, which had only one house instead of the House of Representatives and Senate that the modern American government has. There was no national head of state, and each state was governed individually. Congress had limited power and it did not have the power to tax, as that power and many others remained with individual states.


What is the definition of the framers of the Articles of Confederation?

The Framers of the Articles of Confederation were the delegates who drafted and adopted the Articles of Confederation, which served as the first constitution of the United States from 1781 to 1789. These Framers included leaders such as John Dickinson, John Hanson, and Thomas McKean, among others. They aimed to create a loose confederation of states with a weak central government, reflecting the fear of centralized authority that emerged from the American Revolutionary War.


What was the basic problem with the articles of confederation which the constitution replaced?

Too much power to the States. They ended up destroying each-others economies.


What are the key common of member of congress?

Common characteristics of members of Congress is the ability to deceive others and a desire to better themselves at the expense of others. Most members of Congress have these character traits.


What was the names of the constitutional convention that was called to address the problems that the US faced under the articles of confederation?

The name of the constitutional convention called to address problems faced by the U.S. under the Articles of Confederation was just that - the Constitutional Convention. Participants included George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and others.


Did the articles of Confederation only create one branch of Government?

The Articles of Confederation created only a legislative branch of government as to prevent Congress from gaining full control. Their method of doing this was creating a "firm league of friendship" rather than a strong central government and allowing states to retain the most power. In doing so, however, many feared that some states would retain too much power and dominate others in the national government. The Articles of Confederation dealt with these fears by giving each state only one vote regardless of its population and ordaining that on important issues, nine states would have to agree in order to come to a solution.