It does not. Cell theory is fully compatible with evolutionary theory. Does this mean we know everything about the evolution of cells? No. We say we do not know, not that cell theory shows that evolutionary theory is incorrect. ( except, of course, if you are referring to heritability. This Darwin got wrong, but this is not directly related to cell theory )
Many different theory hold modern biology together --------------------------- The answer they were looking for is 'evolution'.
There are no reasonable scientific alternatives to cell evolution, especially since the endosymbiotic theory is now widely accepted. I an sure you can think of some unreasonable alternative to cell evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Cells could be though as organisms in unicellular especially.
it shows the process by evolution and study of structures of animals
Because viruses are single-cell organisms, they can mutate (evolve) quicker than complex, multi-cell organisms, where evolution gradually happens over time spans that humans can hardly fathom. Viral mutations give evolutionary biologists the opportunity to observe the process within timespans a human being can grasp. It not only supports the theory of evolution, but confirms it with demonstrable evidence.
They do not belive in the theory of evolution beacuse it contradicts the bible's idea that the human race was created in 6 days.
Darwin's theory of evolution contradicts the literal interpretation of creation as taken from The Bible
Evolution does not contradict religion itself. It contradicts the interpretation of a religious text as a literal description of biology. By the same token, the solar system contradicts the interpretation of religious text as meaning the Earth is the center of the Universe.
It does not. Cell theory is fully compatible with evolutionary theory. Does this mean we know everything about the evolution of cells? No. We say we do not know, not that cell theory shows that evolutionary theory is incorrect. ( except, of course, if you are referring to heritability. This Darwin got wrong, but this is not directly related to cell theory )
The theory of evolution is states all life evolved from a single living cell.
Many different theory hold modern biology together --------------------------- The answer they were looking for is 'evolution'.
Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory, but it is still a theory. It cannot be absolutely proven, it can only be supported by evidence.There are unknown facts about the theory, such as how/where the first cell(s) originated.
Charles Darwin was accused of Heresy because in his time everyone believed in God and he proposed the theory of evolution which contradicts that God created the universe in which we live in today
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.
There are no reasonable scientific alternatives to cell evolution, especially since the endosymbiotic theory is now widely accepted. I an sure you can think of some unreasonable alternative to cell evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Cells could be though as organisms in unicellular especially.
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.
No scientific theory ever challenged the theory of evolution.