answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Including the three-fifths clause and the fugitive slave clause in the constitution would suggest that the country approved of slavery. This is in stark contrast with the constitution's statement that all men are equal.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Ahmeraka b

Lvl 2
2y ago
  1. The repetitive direct taxes should be appointed to several years in the states which may be included in each of the unions towards their respective numbers that determine by adding whole numbers of a free person and those enslaved to services over a term of years. It was in migration and people from any state from passing laws that banned enslavement until 1808 prohibiting legislative in a particular area by banning the importation of slaves. The main impact was giving South Carolina twenty years to prepare for every possible ending of receiving African slaves. No person or laborer server in a state under the law couldn't escape in another consequence of any other law discharged from service labor but can be delivered upon a claim to the party that labor may be due

  2. The argument I would use is Including the theThree-Fifths Clause, fugitive slave clause in the constitution would suggest that the country approved of Against Amending the Slave Trade Clause slavery. This is in stark contrast with the constitution's statement that all men are equal. If all men are equal shouldn't say all men and women are equal

Constitution Says 'All Men' Are Created Equal? NYT, NBC Got it Wrong, Too | CNSNews

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What arguments can be made for and against including the three-fifths clause and the fugitive slave clause in the constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp