answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Nullification Act of 1832

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What argued that states could nullify and act of congress?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What did the Kentucky Resolution had originally stated?

States could nullify laws of Congress


Who can nullify an Act of Congress?

The Supreme Court can nullify an Act of Congress. They would have to say that it specifically contridicted the Constitution. The President could affect a law by refusing to enforce it.


Jefferson and Hamilton differed on the question of whether or not Congress could do what?

They disagreed on practically everything but their esteem for George Washington. Specifically, however, their greatest and most significant difference on a power of Congress was whether Congress could establish a national bank (the "First Bank of the United States"). Hamilton argued that because Article I, section 9 of the Constitution did not specifically prohibit Congress from creating a national bank, then Congress was empowered to do so under Article I, section 8, clause 18 (the "implied powers clause," "necessary and proper clause," or "elastic clause"). Jefferson, who took a more limited view of Federal power, argued that because Article I, section 8 did not specify Congress could create a national bank, then it could not. Jefferson believed that only specified powers (such as power to tax, to maintain an army, to punish counterfeiters, etc.) could be exercised by Congress.


Under the Articles of Confederation what could congress?

Congress could not tax and it could not control or interfere with trade between the individual states.


Why did Madison not support Hamilton's economic plan?

Because southern states no longer owed money for the war...

Related questions

What did the Kentucky Resolution had originally stated?

States could nullify laws of Congress


What did the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions argue?

States could nullify federal laws. That states could and should decide when Congress was passing unconstitutional laws PLATOO against a loose interpretation of the constitution


In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?

In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.


Who can nullify an Act of Congress?

The Supreme Court can nullify an Act of Congress. They would have to say that it specifically contridicted the Constitution. The President could affect a law by refusing to enforce it.


What was nullification?

Nullification was the idea that the states could declare acts of congress to be unconstitutional. In particular South Carolina objected to the federal tariff while Jackson was president and decided to nullify it and so not collect it or pay it.


What senator held that states could not nullify a federal law and said that liberty and union were inseparable?

Daniel Webster


What did the doctrine of nullification maintain?

b. state government could nullify any federal law.


What was the The Doctrine of Nullification?

This doctrine taught that any state could nullify a law of the United States that was contrary to the Constitution as they understood it.


The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions argued what?

According to the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, the States had power to whatever the Federal Government did not have, as written in the Constitution.Examples: Schools, License plates, Birth Certificates, Death Certificates, ect...


Jefferson and Hamilton differed on the question of whether or not Congress could do what?

They disagreed on practically everything but their esteem for George Washington. Specifically, however, their greatest and most significant difference on a power of Congress was whether Congress could establish a national bank (the "First Bank of the United States"). Hamilton argued that because Article I, section 9 of the Constitution did not specifically prohibit Congress from creating a national bank, then Congress was empowered to do so under Article I, section 8, clause 18 (the "implied powers clause," "necessary and proper clause," or "elastic clause"). Jefferson, who took a more limited view of Federal power, argued that because Article I, section 8 did not specify Congress could create a national bank, then it could not. Jefferson believed that only specified powers (such as power to tax, to maintain an army, to punish counterfeiters, etc.) could be exercised by Congress.


What could congress not under the Articles of Confederation?

Congress could not tax and it could not control or interfere with trade between the individual states.


What could congress do under the Articles of Confederation?

Congress could not tax and it could not control or interfere with trade between the individual states.