Ethical or moral debates.
Philosophy is not a science, although there is such a thing as a philosophy of science. That is to say, there are certain value judgments that people make in order to accept scientific methods and conclusions. Other people reject science on the grounds that everything they need to know is in the bible. That is a philosophical choice. Whether it is a wise choice or a foolish choice, is a matter of personal opinion.
Daoism teaches that all people are naturally good. If there is good there has to be bad. If there is beauty there has to be ugliness. If there is peace there has to be war. That's basically yin and yang. In order to behave correctly, one must connect with nature. These are basically the Daoist beliefs.
The point of the parable for me is that everyone is going to die, just like the Galileans and those at the tower of Silaom. The cause of a person's death is not an indication of whether that person had a relaionship with the Triune God. He was warning people not to make judgments about others' lives but to make sure they changed their minds about who God is and that He has included everyone into his family. The open ending of the parable suggests that Jesus may have wanted his listerners to finish it for themselves.
If we believe a simple translation of the term cultural, it relates to artistic or social pursuits considered to be valuable or enlightened. So, here we have an cultural advantage. An argument on the contrary refers to the behaviours and beliefs of a particular social, ethnic or age group. The summary of this is that we create personal attitudes in the way that a person views something, and tends to behave towards it, often in an evaluative way. The advantages and disadvantages remain in the minds of the people discussing your question
The only way to keep a community clean and peaceful is by the participation and involvement of a majority of the people of the community. When you leave everything up to the government or officials, you 'get what you pay for'. There is much more satisfaction in personal accomplishment and working with your neighbors, by caring for your community's physical needs (cleanliness and good repair). Participating also keeps you knowledgeable about what's going right and what's going wrong. The peace is kept (for the most part) when you know the people in the community and respect them (even if you don't really like them), they will be more likely to behave respectfully themselves. A formal process for dispute mediation by members of the community is a sound way to keep disputes from getting too serious, especially when everyone must have a turn at participating.
There are many people who like political debates.
integrity
People behave politically because that is like a law the government made
People behave very nicely on Diwali. They greet each other.
Barbershop - 2005 Debates and Dead People - 1.8 was released on: USA: 2 October 2005
There are numerous reasons why people behave badly. Some people will behave badly due to low self esteem, and act out of character. Other people may behave badly due to peer pressure and societal influences.
The reason why people behave the way they usually behave in an organisation is because they are at work and not at play and they must be seriously dedicated and must do the right requirements before they are blamed for the problem they caused
Hi As in life there are always at least to ways to answer a question, and in debates there are two types of debate. There is open debate that can lead to a general acceptance of a topic, that can become a specific norm, that can influence people. There are closed debates that are not aired in the general domain, and these do little to directly influence people.
people judge people & make an agreement w00tw00t
Solomon Asch conducted a famous experiment in which he demonstrated that people's judgments are heavily influenced by the judgments of others.
Which desert and which people. Please be specific.
Because simplicity has no value in this world. People only favors those who behave diplomatically.