bann manje kaka
Apex- Mrs. Jankowski is wearing a bedding belt around her waist
Mrs.Janowaski is wearing
Xavier is acting out his favorite movie scene.
Mrs. Jonowinski
One example of homonyms in Filipino words is the word "buto," which can mean both "seed" and "bone" depending on the context. Another example is the word "baka," which can mean both "cow" and "maybe" depending on the context.
Homonyms of "wear" include "where" and "ware." "Where" is used to inquire about a location or place, while "ware" refers to goods or merchandise, especially in a commercial context.
Yes, spell checkers can distinguish between homonyms based on context. By analyzing the surrounding words in a sentence, spell checkers can suggest the correct spelling of a homonym to ensure the intended meaning is conveyed accurately.
Homonyms are words that are spelled and pronounced the same but have different meanings. For example, "bat" can refer to a piece of sports equipment or a nocturnal flying mammal. Homonyms can create confusion in language and require context to understand their intended meaning.
Homonyms are words that have the same spelling or pronunciation but different meanings. For example, "bat" can refer to a flying mammal or a piece of sporting equipment. These words can create confusion in language and require context to determine their intended meaning.
Context clues such as surrounding words, the tone of the sentence, or related details can help you understand that "infiltrated" means to pass surreptitiously into or through a place. For example, "The hacker infiltrated the company's database" implies unauthorized access, whereas "The spy infiltrated the enemy base" implies stealthy entry.
a simile or metaphor
Context clues provide information about the meaning of a word based on its surrounding words or sentences. This can include synonyms, antonyms, examples, or explanations that help to infer the meaning of the unknown word. Paying attention to context clues can help improve vocabulary comprehension.
Context clues can help you figure out the meaning of a word in a sentence or paragraph. To use context clues, you read the sentences surrounding the word that you do not know to figure out what it means.
Its context
"whos" is not a word. "who's" and "whose" are homophones -- they sound identical. they are not homonyms, synonym, nor antonyms. "who's" is a contraction for "who is" or sometimes "who has" as in the examples "who's at my door?" and "who's eaten my cake?" "whose" is a possessive form of "who" -- "it was mark whose dog got into our garbage" or "whose dog is this in my garbage?" "who's" works similarly to "what's" in most sentences, one refering to people and the other to things. "whose" is the possessive of "who," just like "my" is the possessive of "i/me" and "your" is the possessive of "you."
Yes, sentences beginning with "maybe" can end in a question mark if the sentence is posing a question or seeking confirmation.
Yes. Well written questions are sentences. If you are talking about using the words all by themselves, then context comes into play. I would argue that, without any context at all, this: 'Who?' is not a question. But in context like this: John said "Someone brought a casserole to share with us for lunch." "Who?" Mary replied. I would argue that the predicate is understood, and 'who' is a sentence.
Supporting details are the context clues that let the readers know what the poem is about.
A following of one thing after another in the context of time.
the jazz age
Both phrases are correct, but "following closely" is more commonly used and is generally preferred. It is a more natural word order in English and flows better when spoken or written.