a president and a supreme court - apex
What do you mean by "This way?" Are you referring to the process that was used or to how they structured the document? And If you mean the process, do you mean why did the constitutional convention work according to the rules it did or do you mean whay was the convention held? If you mean why was the constitution structured the way it was, what specifically do you want to know? Michael Montagne
The Ancient Athens Government was structured by the council of 500 people, the Assembly and finally the court. I hope that this information will help you.
Under the Articles of Confederation the federal government was structured so that Delegates were chosen by state legislatures, and each state had one vote in Congress.
Probably the articles of Confederation, which did not have sufficient binding authority and were hence a rope or hoop of sand- Franklin did not approve- l3 staves and no hoop will not form a barrel ( for a cannon?) the much more structured continental congress aimed at correcting the situation.
It is structured with the Queen at the top, and then the Prime Minister, then the govt, and then the citizens.
Under the Articles of Confederation the federal government was structured so that Delegates were chosen by state legislatures, and each state had one vote in Congress.
The Constitution of the United States may be altered legally in two ways:First, by vote of two thirds of both houses of the Congress of the United States and then upon ratification (either by the state legislature or by a ratifying convention as required by state law) by three fourths of the state legislatures and/or ratifying conventions.Second, by a Constitutional Convention called by the legislatures of two thirds of the states. Scholars disagree on how such a convention would be structured and if what it considers can be limited or expanded upon. In theory a Constitutional Convention may be able to throw out the entire Constitution and replace it with something else, and if three fourths of the states could be enjoined to ratify that move, our whole form of government would change. After all, it was the Second Constitutional Convention in 1787 that threw out the Articles of Confederation, under which our government had been operating since winning the war over England, and replaced them with the Constitution that we now operate under.
What do you mean by "This way?" Are you referring to the process that was used or to how they structured the document? And If you mean the process, do you mean why did the constitutional convention work according to the rules it did or do you mean whay was the convention held? If you mean why was the constitution structured the way it was, what specifically do you want to know? Michael Montagne
federal government provincial government municipal government
The most important challenge that the Constitutional Convention faced was deciding how strong the Central/National government should be and how the states would be represented in the new government.
kdffdfd
By its government….
none
the spartan government was structured based on the strength of their military
The United States government is a federal government with a constitution as the framework.
on cheese. (da dum clash)
did the arawaks lived in an organized society with a structured government