In Britain, punishments certainly do not fit the crimes, many of our laws are outdated, and many sentences are too lenient. Petty crimes often incurr heavy sentences, whilst serious crimes incurr too light a sentence. The reason our prisons are overcrowded, is that there are not enough deterrents in place, and most people know, that our punishment laws are very much a "soft touch".
In some countries torture is still used
The crime of mugging was punishable by hanging.
Pardons relieve a person of any punishment for crime. Reprieves temporarily postpone punishments.
The punishment depended on the crime.
amendment 13
Yes, the punishment should fit the crime to ensure fairness, proportionality, and justice. Matching the severity of punishment to the seriousness of the offense helps to maintain trust in the legal system and promote deterrence.
The idea is that the punishment must fit the crime. If the punishment is too gentle (a scolding for beating someone up) then people will commit the crime without being concerned about the punishment. If the punishment is too harsh (death for walking on the grass) then magistrates will be reluctant to convict and impose the sentance.
the 8th amendment
The biggest weakness in the justice system is; the punishment doesn't fit the crime.
"Let the punishment fit the crime."
Cesare Beccaria
It depends on what said child did, does the punishment fit the crime?
This is generally a euphemism for the theory of "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth."
intentional act against legal parameters is crime. punishment do not define crime.
The Esperanto word for crime is "krimo" and the word for punishment is "puno".
fixed punishment for each type of crime
Dostoyevsky published Crime and Punishment in 1866.