It depends on which Pokemon learns it, what type they are, what level they are, etc.
But hyper beam needs one turn to recharge, and solar beam doesn't. I would say hyper beam although, because recharging moves usually inflict more damage.
Answered by christopher
it really depends on the user's type. if its a grass Pokemon that is using solarbeam its power would be 180 instead of 120 because of stab.
Oh this is a different person but you can also use Sunny Day to have Solarbeam only take one turn to charge. Sunny Day + Solarbeam combo is amazing.
Solar power is energy from the sun, so a desert region would be better for solar power because there are longer hours of sun in the desert than in the polar regions.
Absolutely, in fact, better than here on Earth because there is no atmosphere to block some of the light. Solar is how many satellites and the International Space Station are powered.
black because black takes in light and creates heat better than any other color.
As with any question, the answer depends on context. Solar ovens tend to cook slower, at lower temperature, this help meats retain more moisture. But that means it takes longer..... The energy of the sun is FREE, that's better too! But you may have to tend the oven, keeping it pointed toward the sun as it moves.... So if you have the time, go solar.
Quite simply, you get less solar energy than when it is not cloudy. For example, a solar stove can still heat water, but it will no longer boil.Quite simply, you get less solar energy than when it is not cloudy. For example, a solar stove can still heat water, but it will no longer boil.Quite simply, you get less solar energy than when it is not cloudy. For example, a solar stove can still heat water, but it will no longer boil.Quite simply, you get less solar energy than when it is not cloudy. For example, a solar stove can still heat water, but it will no longer boil.
A hyper is better
arch bridges can support more weight than beam bridges but for price i say beam won.
The vertical portion of the I-beam resists shear force better than a rectangular one. The "I" portion also deflects force because of its design.
Yes,it is cleaner than fuel. It's better for the earth.
because fluorescent has gas in it and solar panels don't :D
solar energy is better than thermal energy as it is an easy and convenient method solar energy is non polluting therefore it is better than thermal energy because thermal energy cause very much pollution and it is costly also but solar energy do not cause pollution and as we are obtaining it from sun so it is cheap also
solar energy is better than thermal energy as it is an easy and convenient method solar energy is non polluting therefore it is better than thermal energy because thermal energy cause very much pollution and it is costly also but solar energy do not cause pollution and as we are obtaining it from sun so it is cheap also
If this is a question of green energy, then yes, solar power is better than coal because it is a renewable source. Coal is a fossil fuel that is non-renewable.
it is better than fossil fuels because it is better for our environment and it will last way longer than fossil fuels. :)
Solar power is more environment friendly than coal power. Solar power is, however, more expensive than coal power.
Im better than grant
coz it is!!