Only if the person that took the car had never before been allowed to use the car. If the person who took that car with out authorization to use the car was a resident of the household and the keys to the car were available then any damage to the car from that usage would probably have to be claimed under the collision coverage.
not "unlawful" but they have no right under the terms and conditions of the contract (policy).
Yes, even with your neighbor's permission it is unlawful.
It depends on whether you have permission from the overpass owner. If you do, it is permitted. If you do not, it is vandalism.
No, there are not. It is unlawful to have a gender specific insurance company. However, the insurance rates at most companies are much lower for females than they are for males.
Simple. If the conduct is contrary to, or in violation of, the laws promulgated by the legislature then those actions are unlawful.
Questioner needs to define what they mean by "coercion" -BUT- as a GENERAL rule, yes, coercion is usually considered unlawful conduct.
No, as long as you dont drive it and can prove it.
In Pennsylvania it is unlawful to tattoo or pierce anyone under the age of 18 without the permission of a parent or legal guardian.
No. Altering documents in such a manner is unlawful.
In most(all?) jursidictions even those types of "friendly" wagering ARE considered unlawful.
Of course. If it was taken without the owners permission how are they supposed to know who took it or if it was going to be returned to them?
Each could be ticketed. The driver for no insurance, and the owner for allowing unlawful operation. In the UK both are equally responsible for 'using a motor vehicle on a road without insurance' and both will be prosecuted.