0
How does Wiesel appeal to the emotions of the audience and leave the audience with a lasting image in the conclusion to his speech?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
By returning to the image of himself as a young boy
Anonymous
In the conclusion of his speech, Wiesel appeals to the emotions of the audience by using vivid and emotional language that evokes a sense of urgency and moral responsibility. By weaving in personal anecdotes and powerful imagery, such as his reference to the "sea of flame," he leaves the audience with a haunting and unforgettable image of the horrors of the Holocaust. This effectively drives home his message and resonates with listeners on a deeply emotional level.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What rhetorical strategy does Wiesel use in the conclusion of his speech to appeal to the emotions of the audience and leave the audience with a memorable image?
He returns to the image of himself as a young boy
Why does Wiesel return to the image of himself as a young boy in conclusion of this speech?
The answer is: To appeal to the audience's emotions and leave the audience with a memorable image. :) Hope this help. Good luck
How does Wiesel most clearly try to persuade the audience in this passage?
buy a pilling to the emotions of the audience
How does Wiesel reestablish his ethos in the conclusion to The Perils of Indifference?
In the conclusion of "The Perils of Indifference," Wiesel reestablishes his ethos by emphasizing the value of compassion and action in the face of indifference. He shares personal experiences and connects them to broader historical implications, reminding the audience of the importance of standing up against injustice. Through his emotional appeal and moral authority as a Holocaust survivor, Wiesel effectively reaffirms his credibility and moral standing on the subject of human rights.
Why does Wiesel return to the image of himself as a young boy in the conclusion of his speech?
Wiesel uses the image of himself as a young boy to emphasize the innocence and vulnerability of the victims of the Holocaust. By recounting his own experiences as a child, he humanizes the suffering and loss experienced by all those who endured the horrors of the Holocaust. This personal connection helps to make the story more relatable and impactful for the audience.
Why does wiesel end his speech with several questions?
To leave unanswered questions for the audience to think about 👍🏽
How was the holocaust considered a dystopia according to night by elie weisel conclusion?
The Holocaust is considered a dystopia in "Night" by Elie Wiesel because it portrays a world where humanity's worst qualities are unleashed, with systematic dehumanization, violence, and genocide. The conclusion of the book reinforces this dystopian view by showing the lasting impact of the Holocaust on survivors like Elie Wiesel, who grapple with profound trauma and loss. The bleak and haunting ending serves as a stark reminder of the horrors of the Holocaust and the darkness that can reside within human society.
What emotions does Wiesel experience that week as he watches his his father die?
He is sad and mad his father won't be around.
Why does Wiesel talk about himself in the third person?
To focus the audience on the terrible experiences he had as a child.
How does Wiesel and rsquos choice of genre prove beneficial in the excerpt?
Wiesel's choice of genre, a first-person memoir, allows him to convey his personal experiences and emotions directly to the reader. This intimate form of writing helps to create a sense of empathy and connection with the audience, making the horrors of the Holocaust more vivid and impactful. Additionally, the memoir format lends credibility to his account as a survivor and allows him to bear witness to the atrocities he witnessed.
Which example from the conclusion of The Perils of Indifference helps Wiesel to reestablish his ethos?
The reminder that Wiesel is a holocaust survivor -Apex
Why does Elie Wiesel use ethos in Night?
Elie Wiesel uses ethos in "Night" to establish credibility and persuade readers by demonstrating his own experiences and authority on the subject of the Holocaust. By sharing his personal story and insights, Wiesel builds trust with his audience and conveys the weight of his words with authenticity.
