0
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoFirst of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did the Romans eat mushrooms?
Edible mushrooms have been available for over 13,000 years. Food tasters were employed by the Roman Emperors to ensure that they were safe to eat
Did jesus die for everybody or only for his people?
Jesus died for everybody, not only the Jews you can learn more about it by following the Roman's road: Romans 3:23 Romans 6:23 Romans 8:1 Romans 5:8 Romans 10:9-10
Why was the Gaocheng Observatory built?
As a place to observe the sky to aid in divining an emperors fate
Who named the universe?
the Romans did
What did Romans smell like?
Horrible
What is the Romans emperors names?
The titles of Roman emperors were Augustus or Caesar.
Who was the roman empire 79AD?
The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.The Romans actually had two emperors in 79AD. Vespasian, who died and Titus who succeeded him.
What did the Romans call the emperors and think they were?
The title of the Roman emperors was Augustus (the venerable one). At the beginning of rule by emperors they were also called Caesars. Later Caesar became the title of the junior emperors. The Romans knew that the emperors were absolute ruler and that is what they thought of them. Many emperors liked to assocate themselves with a divinity
Who created equestrian statues of their emperors?
Romans
What kind of leaders did the Romans have in the 400s?
From 27 BC to 476 AD the Romans had emperors.
Who often created equestrian statues of their emperors?
Romans
What did the Romans value the most?
they valued the emperors the most
Did Christians serve in the roman Senate?
When Christianity was endorsed by the Christian Romans Emperors, these emperors appointed Christian senators.
How many years does a Roman Emperor serve?
Romans emperors reigned for life. Diocletian and Maximian were the only emperors who abdicated.
What did the ancient Romans believe came after death for emporers?
The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.
Did the roman have 300 emperors?
No. The Romans had an official total of 178 emperors. This number covers the entire empire, western part and eastern part.
Did Romans worship Egyptian gods?
Augustus encouraged Romans to accept the eastern practice of deifying emperors after their death. (The Egyptian Pharaohs had always been regarded as gods). Augustus himself was made a god after his death, and so was his wife Livia. Tiberius and Caligula were not made gods (they were unpopular) but Claudius was. Many Roman emperors were deified after death, many were not. It depended on how popular they were.
