Not the existence of quasars, but the fact that all quasars are distant from us.
The best explanation for what we observe when we see quasars is that they are super-massive black holes in early galaxies, burning up solar "fuel" so rapidly that they eventually run out. We do not observe any quasars near to us, so the conditions that allowed quasars to form must have existed only several billion years ago. If our Universe has not changed its basic structure and density over the last 15 billion years or so, then the conditions that would allow quasars would allow them to exist at any time over that span. This would mean that there should be just as many quasars close to us as there are far from us. But we just don't see that. As is the case with many of the things we see, this is easy to explain via Big Bang Cosmology but almost impossible to explain with any alternative.
The existence of galactic clusters is consistent with the Big Bang although it would be equally consistent with the alternative Steady State theory.
No
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for existence within the universe, the actual formation (or creation) of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
The existence of galactic clusters is consistent with the Big Bang although it would be equally consistent with the alternative Steady State theory.
No
The "Big Bang Theory" may account for the events that happened during the first few seconds or minutes of the universe's existence. It doesn't purport to explain anything more recent than that.
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for (or made) existence within the universe, the actual formation of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.
The Big Bang Theory represents the creation event for our existence in a traditional fourth dimensional SpaceTime continuum. Without this environment, there would be no galaxies, solar systems, or planets. So while the Big Bang Theory provided for existence within the universe, the actual formation (or creation) of solar systems and resulting planets would be more accurately present in the Nebular Hypothesis (sometimes referred to as the Nebular Theory).
The Theory of Relativity was created by Einstein, not by Eisenstein. Comment: The most obvious thing is that Einstein's equations predicted that the Universe was not "static". So a "Big Bang", expanding Universe fits the theory.
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Cos it is an amazing tv show
Discard it all.
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
Basically, in that it closely agrees to what is expected from the Big Bang - this includes the existence of the background radiation, its approximate temperature, and its anisotropies. For more details, I suggest you read some more about the cosmic microwave background radiation - for example, you might start with the corresponding Wikipedia article.