I exactly do not know but some body told me they are kakastha gola.
Sikhism explicitly outlaws any caste-based stratification of society. Caste- or nobility-based surnames are therefore not allowed for Sikhs. And therefore, you cannot claim to be both a Sikh and a Jatt. This-as well as the obvious reason that there is no such thing as a uniquely "Sikh" surname other than Singh (for males) and Kaur (for females)-renders the question of "Raj" moot.
What caste is sharan
ha balla rajput is real suryavanshi rajputs. balla rajputs raja ram ke bade bete kush ki 9 pedi me hua raja BAL ki santan he jisene bal shetra ki sthapana ke. balla rajput he sabhi rajputo me ase rajput hua jinhone 2200 sal tak raj kia.
Rajputs are Ruling Caste. But, Jats are Peasant Caste. Rajputs are Kshatriyas and Jats are Kshatriyas. Rajputs found in Rajasthan (mostly). Jats found in Punjab. Most Jats are Sikhs. Rajputs and Jats are located In their own position. There is no lesser or higher.
kanojias are high class rajputs, belongs to kanauj raj(Rajasthan), during the ancient times. They broke their dynasty to several Northern areas of Indus (currently India). Still the lagacy is prevelling in some parts of Rajasthan.. bt due to some brutal attacks, the kingdom couldn't survive much, and nw engaged in several professions and usual businesses.
Rajput
yes rajput khsatriya
answer to your question is Yes,my name is Anil shahi and i m Hindu raj put of A very rare bisen clan.As per my knowledge shahi also comes in Muslim bisen rajputs (converted our relatives)and the title shahi is used by Punjabi rajputs and janjua Muslim rajputs.places where shahis are found: Afghanistan, Pakistan,kashmir, rajasthan, Punjab, haryana,uttaranchal, up, mp, bihar, Nepal.{Iran---- Muslim community}the other confusing part of this surname is many of the shahis are bhumihaaar bhramins (bhramin clan).so if you find shahi from up, bihar and Nepal they could be bhumihaars.
no, rajput sengar lie in upper rung of kshatriya rajputs they are descenders of rishivansh king dasratha married her sister to rishivansha
Sikhism explicitly outlaws any caste-based stratification of society. Caste- or nobility-based surnames are therefore not allowed for Sikhs. And therefore, you cannot claim to be both a Sikh and a Jatt. This-as well as the obvious reason that there is no such thing as a uniquely "Sikh" surname other than Singh (for males) and Kaur (for females)-renders the question of "Raj" moot.
What caste is sharan
yes it is a sub caste of rajputs...
Dharam Raj Singh has written: 'Social inequality in leadership pattern and structure' -- subject(s): Case studies, Caste, Community leadership, Rural development 'Panchayat raj and rural organizations' -- subject(s): Caste, Panchayat, Political leadership
Kirar are not Rajputs, kirars are notified backward class and rajputs are not. However few backward classes have started to claim themselves rajputs such as Kirar Rajput, lodha rajput.
ha balla rajput is real suryavanshi rajputs. balla rajputs raja ram ke bade bete kush ki 9 pedi me hua raja BAL ki santan he jisene bal shetra ki sthapana ke. balla rajput he sabhi rajputo me ase rajput hua jinhone 2200 sal tak raj kia.
Ofcourse panwar as it has route to 'The royal parmar rajput dynasty''..as it has routes with parmar ,we all know that parmar had a huge and long kinngdom..the great raja bhoj,vikramaditya,and the great 'Ujjainiya' rajput Veer kunwar singh ji belongs to parmara dynasty....so jus becauze Panwar has its route with parmar and ujjainiya rajput.....so they hold a higher status than any rajputs ...
Rajpoot is a caste in India and Pakistan. which means son of lords.