answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Science can legitimately be considered to have been a historical outgrowth of what used to be called natural philosophy.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do you consider philosophy as a parent science?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

Why is philosophy considered to be a science?

Most scientists and most philosophers would not consider philosophy to be a science. However, both science and philosophy are characterized by very careful thought and analysis and scholarship. Both are engaged in an effort to understand the universe in which we live. However, scientists emphasize observation, while philosophers emphasize abstract thought. There is certainly some overlap between these subjects, and there is even such a subject as the philosophy of science. There is not, however, a science of philosophy.


Is Philosophy a science or is it more than a science?

Philosophy is a humanity, therefore more accurately an art. There can be an element of science in the form of logic to philosophy, but it is far more than science.


How do you differentiate philosophy as a field of study from science?

Philosophy is subjective and science is objective.


Why is philosophy considered the parent science?

Philosophy, is basically theoretical science. The ancient Greeks thought they could figure out the mysteries of the universe, just by thinking about them. Of course, you're not going to get very far in science, without being able to prove what you're thinking is true. So Galileo Galilei, comes along with a solution to the problem and says you have to use experimentation. The ancient Greeks where pure philosophers, who where responsible for the famed library at alexsandria. Philosophy is called the parent science, because out of it came all other science. And people like Galileo, Newton, and Einstein are some of the very big stepping stones to modern science.


Why is philosophy science of all science?

The philosophy of science is concerned with the assumptions, foundations, methods and implications of science. It is also concerned with the use and merit of science and sometimes overlaps metaphysics and epistemology by exploring whether scientific results are actually a study of truth. In addition to these central problems of science as a whole, many philosophers of science also consider problems that apply to particular sciences (e.g. philosophy of biology or philosophy of physics). Some philosophers of science also use contemporary results in science to reach conclusions about philosophy. Philosophy of science has historically been met with mixed response from the scientific community. Though scientists often contribute to the field, many prominent scientists have felt that the practical effect on their work is limited; a popular quote attributed to physicist Richard Feynman goes, "Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds." In response, some philosophers (e.g. Jonathan Schaffer) have pointed out that it is likely that ornithological knowledge would be of great benefit to birds, were it possible for them to possess it. :D xx

Related questions

Do you consider philosophy a super science?

Yes


Why is philosophy considered to be a science?

Most scientists and most philosophers would not consider philosophy to be a science. However, both science and philosophy are characterized by very careful thought and analysis and scholarship. Both are engaged in an effort to understand the universe in which we live. However, scientists emphasize observation, while philosophers emphasize abstract thought. There is certainly some overlap between these subjects, and there is even such a subject as the philosophy of science. There is not, however, a science of philosophy.


What has the author James H Fetzer written?

James H. Fetzer has written: 'Philosophy and Cognitive Science' 'Philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy 'Computers and cognition' -- subject(s): Cognitive science 'Glossary of epistemology/philosophy of science' -- subject(s): Dictionaries, Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Science, Theory of Knowledge 'Artificial intelligence' -- subject(s): Artificial intelligence 'Philosophy and cognitive science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and cognitive science


How do you differentiate philosophy as a field of study from science?

Philosophy is subjective and science is objective.


Is Philosophy a science or is it more than a science?

Philosophy is a humanity, therefore more accurately an art. There can be an element of science in the form of logic to philosophy, but it is far more than science.


Why Bertrand Russel consider Philosophy as no man's land?

Rusell likens philosophy to no man's land, the area between two trenches of two opposing factions in a war, science being one faction and theology another He argues that philosophy is between science and theology; 'pertinent to attack from both sides' I don't really think it's a particularly great analogy because, if anything, philosophy underpins both theology and science this is saying that in philosophy there is no final solution. but in science 2+ 2=4 that is fact and also experiment, but in philosophy it is just and assumption


Why is science considered to a be cycle?

This question is really one concerning the philosophy or grammar of language, not of science. You may choose to consider it so if it suits the model or argument you wish to offer.


Why is philosophy considered the parent science?

Philosophy, is basically theoretical science. The ancient Greeks thought they could figure out the mysteries of the universe, just by thinking about them. Of course, you're not going to get very far in science, without being able to prove what you're thinking is true. So Galileo Galilei, comes along with a solution to the problem and says you have to use experimentation. The ancient Greeks where pure philosophers, who where responsible for the famed library at alexsandria. Philosophy is called the parent science, because out of it came all other science. And people like Galileo, Newton, and Einstein are some of the very big stepping stones to modern science.


Does philosophy as wisdom aim to be a science?

Philosophy is a science by it self.Human society is a laboratory for its experiments.


Why study of philosophy of science?

Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics. This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician". There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern. Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.


What are the parent disciplines of psychology?

Philosophy and physiology are the parent disciplines of psychology.


Why is philosophy science of all science?

The philosophy of science is concerned with the assumptions, foundations, methods and implications of science. It is also concerned with the use and merit of science and sometimes overlaps metaphysics and epistemology by exploring whether scientific results are actually a study of truth. In addition to these central problems of science as a whole, many philosophers of science also consider problems that apply to particular sciences (e.g. philosophy of biology or philosophy of physics). Some philosophers of science also use contemporary results in science to reach conclusions about philosophy. Philosophy of science has historically been met with mixed response from the scientific community. Though scientists often contribute to the field, many prominent scientists have felt that the practical effect on their work is limited; a popular quote attributed to physicist Richard Feynman goes, "Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds." In response, some philosophers (e.g. Jonathan Schaffer) have pointed out that it is likely that ornithological knowledge would be of great benefit to birds, were it possible for them to possess it. :D xx