0
Can you explain Science without philosophy is blind and philosophy without science is empty?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Science without philosophy has no guide (is blind). It researches pointless things rather than what we want to know, like the origin of the universe and how to stop global warming. Philosophy without science has no substance (is empty): As an example, more than 2000 years ago, the Grecian philosopher Democritus came up with the idea of atoms, but it was just an idea without meaning until science developed to support his theory.
We are just in a position to understand what is philosophy and science.Just may be a drop in the ocean. So let us allow the younger with their beliefs.Tomorrow these beliefs may correct.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
This phrase highlights the importance of combining science and philosophy to gain a deeper understanding of the world. Science provides empirical evidence and data to support theories, while philosophy offers the critical thinking and conceptual frameworks to interpret and make sense of this information. Without philosophy, science may lack meaning and direction, and without science, philosophy may lack grounding in reality.
Anonymous
+Riley cusmera
Init guys ut was good
Anonymous
+Riley cusmera
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can you explain science without philosophy is blind and philosophy without science is empty in the context of education?
Philosophy is a thinking art where people put together what they know and then connect those points of knowledge and go farther with them. In science, one finds hard facts and figures. If you were to have science without philosophy, you could do all the experiments you wanted which would give you those points of knowledge, but you wouldn't think about how they would interlink with others in order to build bridges (of knowledge). Conversely, if you didn't have science, you wouldn't have those points of knowledge. Philosophy would not really be possible because you would not have the basic tools to link bits of information in order to create those conclusions.
Why is philosophy considered the parent science?
Philosophy, is basically theoretical science. The ancient Greeks thought they could figure out the mysteries of the universe, just by thinking about them. Of course, you're not going to get very far in science, without being able to prove what you're thinking is true. So Galileo Galilei, comes along with a solution to the problem and says you have to use experimentation. The ancient Greeks where pure philosophers, who where responsible for the famed library at alexsandria. Philosophy is called the parent science, because out of it came all other science. And people like Galileo, Newton, and Einstein are some of the very big stepping stones to modern science.
Why is pure science one of the most precious of man's wants?
Pure science is valued because it seeks to understand the fundamental principles underlying the natural world without any immediate practical application in mind. It expands human knowledge and leads to advancements in technology and innovation. It also satisfies the innate human curiosity about the universe.
What is the nature of philosophy?
A philosophy is a way of living, and unlike religions which denote a belief in god(s), a philosophy dictates how to live life with out a god. Also a philosophy is a way to study and better understand the world around you, though without going into religious topics (usually). For example Confucianism is a philosophy it teaches people about literature and life but without going into religious topics.
What is a n antonyms for the word philosophy?
The antonym for philosophy could be literalism or dogma, as these terms represent rigid beliefs or adherence to strict ideology without critical thinking or exploration.
How and why science and technology is imfortant to your daily life?
Science can explain how thing happen. Example, science can explain why you can walk without slipping. Without science, there would be no technology. Technology can make what we do simpler. With the help of technology, everything is simpler.
Can you explain science without philosophy is blind and philosophy without science is empty in the context of education?
Philosophy is a thinking art where people put together what they know and then connect those points of knowledge and go farther with them. In science, one finds hard facts and figures. If you were to have science without philosophy, you could do all the experiments you wanted which would give you those points of knowledge, but you wouldn't think about how they would interlink with others in order to build bridges (of knowledge). Conversely, if you didn't have science, you wouldn't have those points of knowledge. Philosophy would not really be possible because you would not have the basic tools to link bits of information in order to create those conclusions.
Who said 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
; The quote is Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. : Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941More quotes of Albert Einstein; see link "Quotes Albert Einstein" on left.
When did Albert Einstein say 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)
Why is it necessary to observe in science?
Without observing there would be nothing to explain. Science is not just a given such as 1+1, science takes patience and knowledge and lots and lots of time.
What has the author James S Perlman written?
James S. Perlman has written: 'Science without limits' -- subject(s): Science, Methodology, Philosophy, Objectivity
Does philosophy more important than techno science?
not definitely! they need each other because without techno, there would be no philosophy. _usepian
Is language is more important than science?
Both language and science are important in their own ways. Language is crucial for communication, expression, and understanding, while science is essential for discovery, innovation, and problem-solving. Both play unique and valuable roles in our lives and society.
Philosophy and science?
philosphy can be categorized as a science because both the main objective of philosophy and the sciences is to make discovery of things. although the sciences make use of the laboratory to prove their discoveries,philosophy makes use of the mind to prove the existence of things. this my reasoning please tell us more They can be categorized together, but science is based on factual evidence, and philosophy is based on mental/mind proofs made without material evidence.
Why is philosophy considered the parent science?
Philosophy, is basically theoretical science. The ancient Greeks thought they could figure out the mysteries of the universe, just by thinking about them. Of course, you're not going to get very far in science, without being able to prove what you're thinking is true. So Galileo Galilei, comes along with a solution to the problem and says you have to use experimentation. The ancient Greeks where pure philosophers, who where responsible for the famed library at alexsandria. Philosophy is called the parent science, because out of it came all other science. And people like Galileo, Newton, and Einstein are some of the very big stepping stones to modern science.
What is the opposition between science and philosophy?
The primary difference between science and philosophy is that science works on experiment, while philosophy with theories. While learning from both angles is necessary to our understanding of the universe, there are certain cases where one applies and the other does not. When philosophy applies and science does not, it is usually an untestable theory like string theory, Man made climate change and the existence of god. When the reverse is true, things are being discovered which are not predicted or even contradicted by know logic, my main example here is quantum mechanics, and previously life science before 'Origin of the Species', basically anything we are categorizing without understanding.
What is the importance of scientists to science?
Without scientists, what is science? Without no one to questions the bounds of our reality and understand of the world, there can be no science.
