Well, it is an experiment in behavioral psychology. The idea is that if we associate one thing with another (in this case, associate a bell with food), that eventually the same things will happen when the associated thing happens as when the original impetus happens. The dogs would start salivating when they saw their food... so they would ring a bell when the food came, and eventually, the dogs would start salivating when the bell rang... even when it was not accompanied by food.
The same thing happens in everyday life to a certain extent. For instance, someone who hates their job will get grumpy whenever they are at work... but they could also start to associate it with other things, like the whole company, the whole city, the whole state. Eventually "I hate California" would express that person's hatred of doing a particular thing or interacting with a particular person, because they have associated other things with whatever they detest. Whether it is worth addressing all of our associations and working through them or just moving to another state depends on the circumstances.
Wiki User
∙ 2012-09-20 04:59:02Neutral stimulus
Because pavlov would feed the dog right after the tone. The dog came to understand that the tone meant food was coming, and would salivate in anticipation.
it is hypothesised that by feeding the dogs meat powedwe after ringing a bell would on average condition the dogs to salivate when the bell is rang
Pavlov's experiment was an experiment of classical conditioning. Everyone knows that when a dog sees food it salivates. In Pavlov's experiment, he rang a bell every time he gave food to his dogs. Eventually, Pavlov found that even when he rang the bell, but did not give his dogs food, they would still salivate. The dogs had become conditioned to expect food when they heard the bell. Therefore, even if there was no food given, they would still salivate at the sound of the bell. He proved that an unrelated stimulus could provoke an uncontrollable, biological response.
Ivan Pavlov was a Russian psychologist who is famously known for his conditioning experiment involving a dog and a bell. What he did was train the dog to salivate by ringing a bell. To do so, Pavlov would place food in front of the dog, and ring the bell. Thus, the dog would salivate at the sight of the food and subconsciously at the sound of the bell. Through conditioning, Pavlov was able to repeat the process until the dog became accustomed to hearing the sound of the bell, and ultimately when the dog heard the bell ring, it would begin to salivate as it had learned to associate the sound of the bell with food, and food resulted in its salivation
Neutral stimulus
Because pavlov would feed the dog right after the tone. The dog came to understand that the tone meant food was coming, and would salivate in anticipation.
Pavlov's dog was trained to respond to a bell by ringing it at the same time as presenting food. The dog soon started to salivate when it heard the bell.
it is hypothesised that by feeding the dogs meat powedwe after ringing a bell would on average condition the dogs to salivate when the bell is rang
pavlov's dog experiment to now that saliva produces........... bcoz of mind we behave
nies bohr created the theory of the atom. that all atom revolves around dog nucleus
The meaning of trying it on the dog is to carry out an experiment. The experiment is usually carried on something new, something that is yet to be used.
Ivan Pavlov
Yes. A dog has a mandible. It is behind the teeth.
Your dog needs a Vet, quickly.
Scratching a dog behind the ears indicates nothing about the dog; it only indicates something about the person who is scratching the dog. Perhaps the person is the alpha male.
dog fleas hide behind the neck of the dog because it is one of the wamer places on the dog and fleas love warm places filled with blood