Of course yes you killed somebody! And you might lose your house if you have GIECO!!!
Legally - an adult. If you are a minor - your parents or guardian would have to do it.
The most likely problem is that state courts might make opposite rulings in the same type of case, or uphold laws contrary to Constitutional guarantees.
Now days people can sue for almost everything. I would think that the judge would be impeached for such an act because the act would be unconstitutional
answer the question somebody...please?
A state law; you would then be tried in a lower state court.
No, if a police officer is killed, his cases are not automatically dropped in court. The court procedures would continue as normal, with replacement officers or other personnel taking over the cases. The prosecution would make necessary arrangements to ensure the cases are pursued and justice is sought.
There are different categories of death. Therefore cases that involve a death may be heard in criminal or civil court depending on the circumstances. A case where a person died as a result of a car accident in which no one violated the law would be heard in civil court. A case in which someone purposely hit and killed someone with their car would be heard in criminal court.
I would go to the court house and ask around. Somebody is bound to know how and where. Use a condom next time or make sure birth control methods are performed.
because the curtis brothers would find out if they would be split up or if they would stay together.also it would decide how long johnny would be in jail if he lived
if your involved in the charges, hearing, or anything to do with the court, no. if not, then you can move out, but it'd be difficult
Persons under legal age may still be tried as adults in court, depending upon their age and the conditions.
Most notably to the court's decision was actually his behavior after the event occurred; returning to the scene in a semi-delirious state, his confession and implications in the tavern with the officer, and his physical state would all have been viable reasons for the court's decision.