answersLogoWhite

0

Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?

Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.


Why would a landowner rather use slavery than indentured servants?

A landowner may prefer slavery over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and were permanent, with no expiration date on their service, whereas indentured servants typically had contracts lasting for set periods of time. Slaves also did not have legal rights or the ability to negotiate terms of their labor, providing landowners with more control and stability.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?

A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.


Did Jamestown use slaves or indentured servants?

They used indentured servants.


Why would landowners use slaves then indentured servants?

Landowners used slaves because they provided a lifetime of labor with minimal upfront costs, while indentured servants had set terms of service and eventually gained their freedom. Slaves were seen as a long-term investment, while indentured servants were a temporary labor solution. Additionally, slaves were often considered property, providing greater control and power to the landowner.


Did new England have indentured servants or slaves?

New England had indentured servants


Why would a landowner rather use slaves than than indentured?

Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?

Slaves were property and they were owned by the plantation owners. All slaves were African Americans and could be identified as slaves. Indentured servants were white people that was working off a 7 year contract. If they wanted they could break the contract and fade into the population.


Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.


Did Plantation workers include indentured servants and slaves?

No. Indentured workers were very early in colonial history and slaves replaced them as workers.


Why did the Jamestown settlers want indentured servants and slaves?

When the colonies required indentured servants or slaves it was to do the work. The first slave arrived in Jamestown in 1609 and after tobacco got a start in the colony workers were needed. Indentured servants didn't work out as well, so more slaves were brought in than indentured servants.


How are slaves different to indentured servants?

Slaves are owned by other people. Indentured servants signed a 7 year contract and were free people.