If the person backing out of the space had not seen a pedestrian walking the "wrong way" it would be the fault of the driver of the car backing out....... So it is the fault of the person backing out. They did not look to make sure it was safe to do so.
The greater fault lies with the person backing out of the parking space. You may still be partially at fault for not driving with due care.
It would be the person driving fault because it is like the same thing as driving and hitting someone.
The person backing out of the lot. Cars in the travel lane have right of way.
In most circumstances, the backing vehicle has the greater duty of care and would be found at fault.
If you are driving the backing car, no matter WHERE the other cas is located, YOU are the one at fault if you collide with it.
This can go either way, most often it is the person who was backing out that is at fault. witnesses would be great to prove this is what happened.
The person backing out. If you were in the lane/road behind them they needed to use caution when backing out.
The driver backing up. Unless you can prove the other car was driving unsafly.
It is the fault of the person backing out. You have the right-of-way if you are driving in a usual and safe manor. The person who hit you should be cited for "backing without caution".
Its logical.........the person who backed out while the other person was at it!
You are at fault.
Backing out of a parking spaceThe person backing up is at fault, they have a greater duty the fact that the person is driving on the wrong side makes no difference. the person shoudl of waited to back out. --yes but like all accidents like these, it is circumstantial; if person A is backing out, person B is flying by @ 20+ mph, person A checks everywhere & sees nothing and proceeds to back out. they are then hit by car A who is at fault for 'not able to control his/her vehicle'. if both are going proper speeds & it is just a bump, it is definitely A's fault, cuz B has the right of way