Some people use initial capitals on all pronouns referring to Jesus or God, as a sign of respect. I have then seen some scholars similarly use initial capitals on all pronouns referring to all gods, in order to demonstrate equal respect.
The King James Bible does not capitalise the pronouns referring to Jesus or God, and I usually follow this precedent.
No.
There is no grammar rule that says you need to capitalize the first letter of a pronoun that refers to either God or Jesus.
However, it is customary in most christian religions, to capitalize such pronouns, but it is not obligatory.
Yes, it is appropriate to capitalize "Jesus Christ" when referring to the biblical figure as it is a proper noun.
Some people capitalise it, as Son of God. If you are using this phrase a a specific, alternative name for Jesus, then it would be grammatically correct to capitalise it.
yes
Yes, it is
Yes.
When you are referring to the birth of Jesus then the word "nativity" should be capitalized.
In most Christian religions, they expect it to be capitalized. But otherwise, no.I received good news today.His new job was good news.The preacher spoke about the Good News of Jesus Christ.
only if used as a first name, such as refering to an expert in a field. In the Bible, Jesus was often referred to as Teacher, because he was a teacher.
The proper name is Jesus (Spanish male given name, from Jesus Christ).
The sign above Christ on the cross was written in three languages: Hebrew, Latin, and Greek. Each language stated "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews."
When you are referring to the birth of Jesus then the word "nativity" should be capitalized.
Gospel should be capitalized when used as a specific reference to any or all of the four Gospels, for example, the four Gospels, the Holy Gospel, the Gospel of Matthew, and in titles of documents. Gospel should be capitalized when beginning a sentence. Gospel should be lowercase when used as a general term meaning "good news" or "story", for example, "the gospel as presented in the New Testament," "Paul took the gospel to the Romans"; of Jesus Christ, when referring to the law and the gospels; when referring to the law and the gospels; when referring to the third reading in the service.
Yes *No. The original idea of "messiah" was "anointed one." Early Jewish peoples were not necessarily expecting one messiah. The idea of one, true Messiah is a later construct, usually referring to Jesus. If you are using Messiah as a name for the figure of Jesus, or possibly someone else, then it should be capitalized. If you are using the word to talk about early Judaism, it probably should not be capitalized.
That is a wonderful question, but the Bible does not use much punctuation, so in reality, speaking of the grammar, it is suppose to be written Jesus, Christ. not Jesus Christ. As many references in the KJV of the Bible, is Christ Jesus, written correctly Christ, Jesus, or Jesus, Christ. It is referring to Christ.
As the alternative term for the blood of Christ, yes. Also, it is synonymous with the Holy Grail and should be capitalized when discussing it as a noun as in the name of a Basilica, book title or song/hymn.
This is referring to Jesus Christ.
they named themselves christians because they were referring to how they were Christ like. Because Jesus is the Christ, or "The Anointed One" and they wanted to show that they would be like unto him
It depends which god you are referring to.
If you are referring to the Spanish pronunciation "hay-sue-s" that is merely a pronunciation of "Jesus." the Greek god and Jesus are unaffiliated.
(Referring to the death of Stephen in the Holy Bible): The Martyrdom of Stephen was and is so important for the fact that he was the first martyr for the sake of Jesus Christ after he (Christ Jesus) had been crucified.
Jesus Christ (or at least he should be)
The Prophet Malachi said there would be a man who would save the entire world from their sins. Obviously, he was referring to Jesus Christ.