Since there was no civilized goverment, the women did not go to school, but learned to make blankets, cook, farm, etc. The boys did have school, but they were more focused on fighting then an education.
Elias Wolf
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoGenerally speaking education was not compulsory as it is today an many parts of the world. so this led to a vast difference in learning between the rich and poor. the rich had time to spend on rather themselves teaching their children or hiring tutors to teach them. Education was certainly not as easily come by as today. today even without formal teaching any person with the drive can pick up educational materials in the form of magazine's, newspapers, books, movies, television, the internet, etc and give them selves an excellent education these opportunity's just did not exist in the days of anent Rome. Education was for the privileged and only some of them indulged in it to deeply.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoSince there was no civilized goverment, the women did not go to school, but learned to make blankets, cook, farm, etc. The boys did have school, but they were more focused on fighting then an education.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThere was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
There was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe education of a slave in ancient Rome depended upon the slave's function or future function. If he/she were to be simply doing manual labor, then the only education they would get was in regard to their work. However if the slave were a household slave and was being raised as a companion to a child of the household, he/she would get the same education as the master's child.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThere was no education "system" in ancient Rome or the entire ancient world for that matter. Education was a private matter arranged by parents who could afford to pay for the schooling of their children. There were schools, but they were run the way the headmaster thought proper and not by any civil regulation.
Education in ancient Rome was taught in Latin.
had slaves
the heavy taxes in rome are when slaves are sold
Slaves in ancient Rome did not have their own houses. Domestic slaves lived in the same house as their owners and had rooms/space there. Farm slaves or public slaves in the city were housed in barracks.
15% of ancient Romans were slaves. the rest were lucky
If their masters were kind enough, yes.
Slaves came to ancient Rome through slave traders from Europe and Middle East.
Basically household slaves kind got paid but not public slaves
Education in ancient Rome was taught in Latin.
Yes they did!
had slaves
pizza
slaves
Abandoned children in Rome were made into slaves, fathers had the right to sell their children as slaves, and slaves were also captured in wars and brought back to Rome to be sold.
No, they did not, nobody had time or inclination to educate slaves.
the heavy taxes in rome are when slaves are sold
The people who owned them.