Animal testing upsets most people because the animals have no say in the experimentation. An animal can't say "that hurts" or "stop". On the other hand, humans can and almost everyone finds human testing repulsive...
A rebuttal is taking the opposite stance that someone has proposed. As no statement has been made no rebuttal can be made.
There are those in favour of testing and those against. So it would depend on who made the first statement as to what the rebuttal should be.
no it is not as bad then animal testing
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid
the cons of animal testing r- costs bunches of $$$
Animal testing sould be illegal because it is harming the animal.
It is a slightly grey area, but generally no.
The current laws regarding animal testing are that the animal testing must be carefully reviewed and overseen. There are several laws regulating the use of animals for testing.
Everything. Without animal testing certain products, materials, and medications would have to be tested on humans. Many people don't realize that animal testing has the biggest part in the medical field. Without animal testing you would not have basic antibiotics that you get from your doctor.
WHats a good thesis statement against animal testing