The Romans did not have the concept of zero-- there is no Roman numeral for zero.
This lack made it virtually impossible to do arithmetic with Roman numerals and that is why we use Arabic numerals nowadays.
There is no 0 in roman numerals.
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
there is no zero in roman numerals
There is no Roman numeral for 0 because they didn't feel it was important.
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
There is no 0 in roman numerals.
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
The representation of 0 in Roman numerals is not applicable as the Romans did not have a symbol for zero in their numerical system.
The difference between roman - numerals and hindu - arabic numerals is that the roman - numerals doesn't have zero 0
there is no zero in roman numerals
There is no Roman numeral for 0 because they didn't feel it was important.
The number "0" does not have a specific representation in Roman numerals. Roman numerals were based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols, so there was no need for a symbol to represent zero.
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
Because an 0 symbol is not needed in Roman numerals for positional place value purposes which is essential in Hindu-Arabic numerals
It is: 0 = N
They are: N-CC
It is: 0 = N and its Latin meaning is zero