0
The argued advantages of deterrence is the idea of a short sharp shock; using a disproportionate punishment could deter future offending. There is also the utilitarian argument by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that the suffering of one may prevent the suffering of many, or could bring about pleasure to many (see theories on Utilitarianism and Hedonism).
However, the disadvantages/criticisms definitely outweight the advantages. There is an argument on disproportionality held by those who support retributive punishment in that the punishment should befit the crime; deterrence tends to be more severe. Also - in practice - it does not deter criminals due to reoffending rates; some evidence shows people are more likely to reoffend if they receive a detterent sentence. There are the ethical arguments on using prisoners in order to send some sort of message to others. Other methods are seen as more effective, such as rehabilitation (reform).
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoit means that people will think twice before committing a crime and that less people will commit the crime because they know the consequences
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What has the author Joanna Shepherd written?
Joanna Shepherd has written: 'Deterrence versus brutalization' -- subject(s): States, Cruelty, Punishment in crime deterrence, Capital punishment
What methodologies of crime prevention are available beyond deterrence and punishment?
What are the methodologies of crime prevention available beyond deterrence and punishment. does punishment an ineffective way to prevent and to deter future criminals from acting out in violent or society damaging ways. Are these new methods better than traditional punishment schemes
The more severe certain and swift the punishment the greater effect it will have is an argument of?
deterrence.
What has the author Johannes Andenaes written?
Johannes Andenaes has written: 'Punishment and deterrence' -- subject- s -: Punishment, Criminal law
What are the five justifications for punishment in contemporary society?
The five justifications for punishment in contemporary society are retribution (punishment as moral retribution for wrongdoing), deterrence (punishment to discourage future crime), incapacitation (punishment to protect society by removing offenders from the community), rehabilitation (punishment as a means to reform offenders), and restitution (punishment to compensate victims or society for harm caused).
Why is that punishment is more effective than deterance?
Certainty has a greater impact on deterrence than severity of punishment. ... Research underscores the more significant role that certainty plays in deterrence than severity — it is the certainty of being caught that deters a person from committing crime, not the fear of being punished or the severity of the punishment.
Justification of punishing criminals rests on using the threat of punishment to discourage further criminality?
deterrence
What aspect of deterrence theory do theorists believe to have the greatest effect on deterring crime?
severity of punishment
What are the five common approaches to punishment according to nina rosenstand?
Deterrence, Rehabilitation, Incapacitation, Retribution, Vengeance.
Should the punishment fit the crime and why?
Yes, the punishment should fit the crime to ensure fairness, proportionality, and justice. Matching the severity of punishment to the seriousness of the offense helps to maintain trust in the legal system and promote deterrence.
The idea that a potential criminal would fear punishment because they know of someone else who was punished is referred to as?
general deterrence
Which early punishment was primarily a strategy of specific deterrence because it made it difficult for individuals to commit future crimes?
Branding
