0
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
What else can I help you with?
Which of these was not a result of Dred Scott v Sanford decision by the us supreme court?
People of all states could decide if they wanted slavery withing their borders. A+Ls: The supreme court declared scott was a free man
Where did the Dred Scott Decision occur?
In the Supreme Court.
How did the north react to the dred Scott case decision?
That the Supreme Court decision was both unnecessary and invalid.
What supreme court decision overturned efforts to limit the spread of slavery?
dred scott
Did the supreme court declare Scott as a free man?
The US Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case resulted in the court making it clear that Scott could not be a free man and denied his case to be free of his slavery status. The Court declared that Scott was not a US citizen, and thus could not sue for his freedom.
What Supreme Court decision overturned both the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty?
Dred Scott v. Sanford
What supreme court decision overturned both Missouri compromise and popular sovereignty?
Dred Scott v. Sanford
What was the supreme court decision of dred Scott v sanford?
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans were not citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. Additionally, the Court declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, as it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slave owners by depriving them of their property.
What Supreme Court decision in effect meant that the Constitution protected slavery?
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
What is a statement that best characterizes Roger Taney?
He was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.
What describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
Which of these was not a result of Dred Scott v Sanford decision by the us supreme court?
People of all states could decide if they wanted slavery withing their borders. A+Ls: The supreme court declared scott was a free man
What supreme court decision in effect meant that the constitution protected?
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
Which was the Dred Scott v Sanford Supreme Court decision?
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered U.S. citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, stating that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories. This decision fueled tensions leading up to the Civil War.
Why did the supreme court decision in dred Scott v sanford outrage northerners?
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford outraged Northerners because it ruled that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and that Congress could not ban slavery in the territories. This decision was seen as a blow to the abolitionist movement and reinforced the perception that the federal government was siding with pro-slavery interests.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
The decision made slavery legal in all U.S. territories that were not yet states.
What Supreme Court decision in effect meant the Constitution protected slavery?
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
