0
In Debate, specifically in a logical argument, Truth is a premise that corresponds to the way the world actually is. Validity in an argument is that if the premises are true, then so is the conclusion (it is possible for the arguments to be valid even if the premises are false). Soundness is when the premises is true and the argument is valid.
To reiterate, arguments cannot be true (only statements can be true), but they can be valid and sound. When an statement is true it goes along with the way the world really is. When an argument is valid, then the premises and the conclusion are logically connected in such a way that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Saying an argument is valid does not guarantee that the premises are true. When an argument is sound, the premises are true and the argument is valid, so the conclusion must also be true.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is truth or soundness called?
A true argument is sound.
What is a basis for a conclusion?
A basis for a conclusion is the evidence, facts, or reasoning that supports the conclusion being drawn. It is the foundation upon which the conclusion is built and is used to demonstrate the validity and soundness of the conclusion.
When would an argument be considered valid?
An argument is considered valid when the conclusion logically follows from the premises provided. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity is a key criterion in determining the soundness of an argument.
Why do you have to verify the conclusion?
Verifying the conclusion is important to ensure that it accurately reflects the information and reasoning provided in the argument. It helps to confirm that the conclusion logically follows from the premises and that it is supported by evidence. This verification process helps to strengthen the validity and soundness of the argument.
Who said critical thinking requires arguments?
Philosopher Bertrand Russell emphasized the importance of critical thinking in analyzing arguments. He wrote that to engage in critical thinking, one must be able to evaluate arguments objectively and assess their validity and soundness.
What is the soundness of conclusions can be drawn from an experiment?
Validity
What is the soundness of the conclusions that can be drawn from an experiment?
Validity
What is truth or soundness called?
A true argument is sound.
What is the truth or soundness is called?
The truth of an argument is referred to as its validity, while the soundness of an argument requires both validity and true premises. A valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises, while a sound argument is also based on true premises.
What does validity mean in a science fair report?
Legal soundness or force
Why is the distinction between validity and soundness relative for us as learners of logic?
Valid = fact from truth problem truth can lie if I was hot I'm god I'm hot thus I'm god Sound is just all factual
What does validity soundness and truth mean as they relate to the area of logical syllogisms?
When two points of view are syllogized, (a branch of logic) and if a reasonable deduction be found to satisfy both combatants, that would symbolize (to them) a sound truth as to the're points of view.
What is validate?
validate (v.) To declare or make legally valid.:To mark with an indication of official sanction.:To establish the soundness of; corroborate.
What is soundness of speech?
Titus 2:8Another answer:In the context of Titus 2:8, "sound" means "truthful; not departing from the truth."
A valid deductive argument with one false premise?
Such a thing does exist. The problem here is the distinction between validity and truth. Validity refers to the soundness of the process of argument, Truth to the arguments affinity with real life states of affairs. It's easiest to understand with a demonstration. In the syllogism, or argument; Steve is a Dog. All Dogs have Brown fur. Therefore, Steve has brown fur. The argument is formally sound, as indicated below; A is B All B are C Therefore, A is C So the Steve argument is valid, even though its second premise (the minor premise) isn't true. Validity isn't about the content of the argument, its about the actual form the argument takes.
What is meant by the term flaws?
The term flaws is meant to state that there is a deficiency or imperfection within in a object or thing. Another accurate definition is that flaws indicate a defect impairing legal soundness or validity.
Words that mean the same as truth?
Reality, validity, verity, facts, certainty, accuracy...
