0
Yes
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Strict liability is liability without fault?
Yes it is
Strict liability and tortuous liability?
Strict liability is a form of civil liability, similar to negligence. The main difference between strict liability and tortious liability is that you can be held liable for any harm resulting from certain activities without any fault, simply because the activity falls within the classification of strict liability. Most states have adopted strict liability in some form, and activities that qualify fall into two general categories.
What is Fault tort liability system?
Tort liability system is divided into two kinds of fault liability and strict liability, tort liability system in which fault tort liability system is the foundation and core. Fault tort liability system involves all aspects of social life, the paper only fault tort liability system has made some important research.
What is strict liability?
Strict liability makes a person responsible for the damage and loss caused by his/her acts and omissions regardless of culpability (or fault in criminal law terms, which would normally be expressed through a mens rea requirement; see Strict liability (criminal)). Strict liability is important in torts (especially product liability), corporations law, and criminal law. For analysis of the pros and cons of strict liability as applied to product liability, the most important strict liability regime,
What are the degrees of mental fault?
Strict liability, negligence, recklessness, general intent, specific intent
What is the difference between absolute and strict liability?
In strict liability, there are certain defenses available whereas in absolute liability, there are none.
What is an example of strict liability crime?
Strict liability usually means that a crime is without fault or without intent. (those aspects do not matter in terms of guilt in these cases) One widely known example is that of large or exotic animal ownership. Strictly by owning a dangerous animal, an owner may be found liable if that animal ever escapes and causes and damage or harm. It doesn't matter if the owner has taken all the typical precautions.
A law that will not allow a person to escape liability for dangerous activities by simply?
Implementing a strict liability law for dangerous activities where individuals engaging in such activities are held accountable for any harm caused, regardless of intent or fault. This would prevent individuals from avoiding liability by claiming ignorance or absence of intent.
Concept of strict liability under Indian penal code?
Strict liability is the liability to punitive sanction despite the lack of mens rea.
Who pays the deductible when the other person is at fault?
There is not deductible with liability insurance coverage. Liability pays the party who is not fault for their damages without a deductible. If you were at fault collision would pay for damages to your vehicle but you will have a deductible of whatever you selected when you purchased the insurance policy.
The doctrine of strict liability only applies to abnormally dangerous activity?
No, the doctrine of strict liability can apply to a variety of other situations beyond just abnormally dangerous activity. These may include certain product liability cases, activities involving animals, and some cases of harmful conduct or behavior. In strict liability cases, the defendant can be held liable for damages without having to prove negligence or intent.
What is the basis for strict liability?
idfk
