Yes, if you leave the scene of an accident then you will have to prove that you did no damage.
Your neighbor is liable for the damage made to your property. It also depends on the kind of damage made to your property. First you should evaluate your case and in that case your neighbor must pay for all the damages which that person is liable.
Mother Nature would be the liable party, Unfortunately, she does not carry insurance. If your property is insured, Then your property Insurance Policy will cover the cost of damage repairs.
owener of property tree is on The owner of the property where the tree is on.
The At-Fault motorist (via their insurance) is liable for damage to property.
You will be liable for the difference.
It would be an auto claim for the damage to the other and a homeowners claim for the damage to your property. You cannot be liable to yourself, so you cannot claim the property damage on your auto policy.
Nobody is liable for an act of nature. Your own comprehensive auto insurance would provide coverage for damage to your vehicle from an act of nature.
If the injury and property damage is to that of another for which you are at fault "Legally Liable" then yes. If the injury is to the insured(s) yourself or your own property then no. it is not possible to be liable to ones own self.
You are responsible, but your homeowner insurance should cover damage.
Yes, likewise his or her parents depending upon the circumstances of the case.
In a word.... YES...... Your landlord has a duty to not cause damage to the property of others
Unless you can prove that the neighbor was negligent by not removing the tree then your insurance pays for your damage. For negligence to occur the neighbor would have to know that the tree was dead and about to fall on your property. Usually you would have had to notify your neighbor in writing of the tree's impending falling for them to be liable.