answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Not quite. It is better to say that Octavian's rise to power consolidated the end of the republic. During Julius Caesar's rule, the republic was all but dead and Caesar's dictatorial powers effectively ended the republic. Although men like Cicero, Pompey and Brutus tried to keep it going, they were unsuccessful.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

No, looking back, it was Julius Caesar's rise to power that signaled the end of the republic. Remember, the senate gave Caesar dictatorial powers for life, thereby giving him all the governing power.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

No, the republic had been dying a slow death since the time of Sulla. Caesar, although holding a legitimate republic office, that of dictator, could be said to have brought about the end of the republic. By the time of Octavian's bid for power against Antony, the dysfunctional senate was split between the two men. Octavian's victory over Antony was simply the last nail in the republic's coffin.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Yes, once Octavian became sole ruler, the republic was history.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

No, it was not.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did Octavian's rise to power signaled an end to the Roman Republic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

How did the officials who ran the roman republic get their power?

The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.


What is the most important power of the consuls in roman republic?

The consuls were the heads of the republic and the army.


Who is military and political leader who transformed the roman republic into a empire?

Julius Caesar is the military leader and the dictator who transformed the roman republic into an roman empire. He assumed total power after transforming the republic into the empire.


Why was the power shared in the roman republic?

This is from Google Definitions: (in ancient Rome) One of the two annually elected chief magistrates who jointly ruled the republic. It's the definition of a consul. The power was divided between the two consuls in normal times, by each man "taking the fasces" or acting as leader of the senate, in alternate months.


Which group had the most power roman republic or greek?

The Roman Republic as the many Greek nations were never united for extended periods of time.

Related questions

Octavian's rise to power signaled an end to the Roman Republic?

Its true


How did the officials who ran the roman republic get their power?

The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.The Roman officials of the republic got their power directly from the people as they were elected.


The major power struggles in the early roman republic were between?

The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.The two groups in the early Roman republic that had a major power struggle were the patricians and the plebeians.


The end of the Roman Republic occurred when what man came to power?

The Roman Republic ended when Caesar Augustus came to power


In what year did Pope Pius get captured?

In 1798 he was captured. In fact he also signaled a temporary break in the power of the Roman Church!


Who did not have power in the roman republic government?

Just about everyone


What is the most important power of the consuls in roman republic?

The consuls were the heads of the republic and the army.


Who is military and political leader who transformed the roman republic into a empire?

Julius Caesar is the military leader and the dictator who transformed the roman republic into an roman empire. He assumed total power after transforming the republic into the empire.


Why was the power shared in the roman republic?

This is from Google Definitions: (in ancient Rome) One of the two annually elected chief magistrates who jointly ruled the republic. It's the definition of a consul. The power was divided between the two consuls in normal times, by each man "taking the fasces" or acting as leader of the senate, in alternate months.


Which group had the most power roman republic or greek?

The Roman Republic as the many Greek nations were never united for extended periods of time.


What was the military power in Roman Republic?

The military power in the Roman republic was the same as it had always been -- the Roman army. Whoever led the army, or at least a few legions, could hope for supreme power if he wanted it. Men such as Marius, Sulla, Pompey and Caesar used their legions to gain power.


Who came to power when the end of the Roman Republic occurred?

Caesar Augustus