0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Beau
Judy
Maxine
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Qualitative data and quantitative data?
Qualitative data is descriptive and non-numeric in nature, often including words, images, or observations. Quantitative data is numerical and can be measured, counted, or statistically analyzed. Qualitative data is used to explore themes and patterns, while quantitative data is used for statistical analysis and to make numerical comparisons.
What is a qualitative data?
Qualitative data is data that is not easily quantifiable (meaning it's usually not in hard numbers). This type of data is collected through methods of observations, one-to-one interviews, conducting focus groups, and similar methods.
Is cultural anthropology a natural science?
Cultural anthropology is considered a social science rather than a natural science. It focuses on studying human societies, cultures, and behavior through qualitative research methods, while natural sciences typically focus on the physical and natural world using quantitative methods.
What are two types of analysis that can be effectively integrated to determine a more complete view of history?
Two types of analysis that can be effectively integrated to gain a more comprehensive view of history are quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis involves the use of statistical data, such as demographic trends or economic indicators, to identify patterns over time. In contrast, qualitative analysis focuses on narratives, primary sources, and cultural contexts, providing deeper insights into human experiences and motivations. Together, these approaches allow historians to construct a more nuanced understanding of historical events and social dynamics.
What are criticisms of the scientific approach?
Some criticisms of the scientific approach include its potential for bias due to funding sources, limitations in studying complex social or psychological phenomena, and a tendency to prioritize quantitative data over qualitative insights. Critics also argue that the scientific method may be prone to oversimplification and may not always account for contextual factors.
