Because she didnt know she was helping it was Zeus's plan
consider that farm technonlogy would increase production
Zeus never destroyed the race of man. He was considering it, when Prometheus pleaded with him to spare the species (before Pandora's creation). And when Prometheus directly disobeyed Zeus' order to keep fire from humans, Zeus punished him by chaining him to a mountain and setting above him an eagle that would pick out his liver every day. But Zeus was not through with his punishment. He went after Prometheus' brother under the pretense of friendship and forgiveness. Zeus and the other Olympians created Pandora, and they gave to her an ornately designed box, made by Hephaestus. She was told never to open the box. Then the gods mischievously gave her curiosity. Despite his brother's warnings, Epimetheus accepted the gift. They lived happily together, but Pandora could not keep the thought of the box out of her head. She convinced herself that the gods were only joking when they said not to open it. Pandora believed that there were jewels inside, and the gods were probably offended that she hadn't thanked them yet. So she finally talked herself into opening the box. Once opened, out came all of the Spites of the world: Old Age, Sickness, Labour, Vice, Insanity, Passion. And at the very bottom of the box was the delusive Hope.
As the previous answer was completely incorrect; I will delete it. The most prominent would be when for three years, she stalled the suitors by claiming to need to weave a shroud for Laertes, Odysseus' father. By day, she would work at the loom, and by night, she would sneak in and undo all the work. It would have been a much lengthier scheme if a backstabbing maid did not expose her to the suitors and force her to finish the shroud.
Yes, it is perfectly logical to do so, especially where considering the boundaries of logic itself, where that logic is applied in ways contrary to normal logic forms, or where suing logic to prove that the illogical truly is illogical (for example, proving that an assumption is incorrect as it would lead to a contradiction, the basis of RAA, means logically considering the illogical).
A rhetorical question.yes The most concise answer would have been to not answer. Now that we're past that, there may be two other categories of questions without an answer. Unanswerable questions often cited such as "Is there a god?", and "What is the meaning of life" are really no different from questions like "What am I wearing?" or "Why can water never become ice?". These questions are all not answerable because they make sense but the information cannot be generally obtained, or because they contain incorrect assumptions or are otherwise invalid. The most fundamentally unanswerable questions would be ones that contain an embedded paradox. I invite better students of Philosophy to contribute such questions to improve my answer.
because she is not
Because mama obama :)
to all of you out there looking up this question so you don't have to read the real passage, you're literally my best friend cuz im out here doing the same thing. hey, whatever works to get pass 7th grade hahah!
That would be Pandora.
That would be a benefactress.
A word pair that completes benefactor and money would be kroner donor.
Pandora's box contained all the world's evils...and hope. So if Pandora had a "companion" in the box, I would say her companion would have to be hope.
This was the patron-client relationship.
Every Christmas, the students on scholarships send thank-you cards to their benefactors.Bill Gates is a huge benefactor in many charities because he has donated a lot of money.
Myth
Myth
Yes it would be incorrect.