0
because, AMERICA!
I'm a free man!
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If the interest rate is 5 percent what is the present value of a security that pays you 1100 next year and 1210 the year after would you be willing to pay 2310 for this security why or why not?
The NPV of this security is calculated as follows: (2310) + 1100/1.05 + 1210/1.05^2 = (164.87) Since the NPV of this investment is negative, you should not buy it.
Where can you get positive and negative wires for a class project?
You can get the positive and negative wires for a class project at a store that sells the Physics apparatus.
Response to the Caledonia Products Integrative Problem?
Response by R. NowaidResponse to the Caledonia Products Integrative ProblemProject ranking is prioritizing projects based on a project's stream of cash flow by measuring net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), and Macaulay duration that is calibrated based on cash-flow timing. Conflict of ranking arises when managers have to make subjective decisions due to organizational goals and needs. In a mutually exclusive projects three factors remain as key ranking elements; (1) size disparity; (2) time disparity; and (3) unequal lives.Size Disparity"The size disparity problem occurs when mutually exclusive projects of unequal size are examined." In the case for Caledonia Products, Project A and B may have the same initial investment amount; however, cash inflow of Project A begins in the first year but Project B begins in the fourth year. Both projects vary on net to present value, internal rate of return, and profitability index. If size disparity causes conflicting ranking among mutually exclusive projects, then the project with the largest net present value is considered; given the fact that there would be no capital rationing. Standing alone on this criteria, Project B is more viable because total NPV of Project B is higher that Project A.Time Disparity"The time disparity problem and the conflicting rankings that accompany it result from the differing reinvestment assumptions made by the net present value and internal rate of return decision criteria." In case of Caledonia Products, total cash flow at the fifth year for Project A is $40,000 less than Project B's, NPV for Project A is less than Project B's. Project A begins cash inflow at the first year, the payback period for Project A is 3.125 years versus 4.5 years for Project B, and IRR for Project A is 18.03% versus Project B's IRR is 14.87%. Assuming that cash inflow during life of project can be reinvested, that would make Project A to be more viable.Unequal LivesUsing size and time disparities in conjunction with NPV and IRR may lead to conflicting results in analyzing mutually exclusive projects. A primary cause of conflicting ranking can be timing of the cash flows of the mutually exclusive projects. In the case of Caledonia Products, Project B may have higher total cash flow at maturity and NPV of Project B may be higher as well; however, Project A makes cash available now. Knowing cash is king, and Project A's cash inflow begins in the first year versus Project B's cash inflow that begins in the fifth year, and this feature would make Project A more attractive.AnalysisInitial net investment in Project A and Project B are equal; however, total cash flow for Project A is $40,000 less than Project B's total cash flow and NPV for Project A is less than Project B's NPV.Considering aforementioned facts one manager may consider Project B because it has greater NPV and total Project cash value; however, Project A has one main incentive, on-going cash flow throughout the Project. Project A generates continues cash flow through the life cycle of the Project; whereas, Project B requires the organization to operate without incoming cash flow until the Project is completed.Conclusively, if the organization is in need of cash to maintain profitable operation by avoiding external financing and loan, then Project A makes most sense; however, if the organization is not in need of immediate cash, then Project B is a better decision. For example, a small construction company needs continues cash inflow to prevent expensive financing of project. On the other hand, a major meatpacking firm, which does not have cash flow problem, may wait to the delivery date to collect all its funds at a greater amount.
What are the formulae involving the calculation of flotation cost?
Your company is considering a project that will cost $1 million.The project will generate after-tax cash flows of $250,000 per year for 7 years. The WACC is 15% and the firm's target D/E ratio is .6 The flotation cost for equity is 5% and the flotation cost for debt is 3%. What is the NPV for the project after adjusting for flotation costs? fA = (E/V) x fE + (D/V) x fD fA = (.375)(3%) + (.625)(5%) = 4.25% PV of future cash flows = 1,040,105 NPV = 1,040,105 -1,000,000/(1-.0425) = -4,281
Advantage and disadvantage of NPV what is the advantage and disadvantage of Net Present Value Method?
Advantages: a. It will give the correct decision advice assuming a perfect capital market. It will also give correct ranking for mutually exclusive projects. b. NPV gives an absolute value. c. NPV allows for the time value fo the cash flows. Disadvantages: a. It is very difficult to identify the correct discount rate. b. NPV as method of investment appraisal requires the decision criteria to be specified before the appraisal can be undertaken.
If the opportunity cost of capital for a project exceeds the projects IRR then the project has a NPV negative?
If the opportunity cost of capital for a project exceeds the Project's IRR, then the project has a(n)
Why the NPV of a relatively long term project is more sensitive to changes in the cost of capital than is the NPV of a short term project?
due to the uncertainty
The net present value and profitability index methods to give consistent accept-reject decisions?
Yes, The PI and NPV always give the same decisions to accept or reject the projects. The Project's PI will be greater than 1.00 if the NPV is positive and PI will be less than 1.00 if the NPV is negative
For the NPV criteria a project is acceptable if the NPV is while for the profitability index a project is acceptable if the profitability index is?
less than zero, greater than the requred return
Harrys inc is considering a project that has the following cash flow and wacc data what is the projects npv?
Harry\'s Inc. is considering a project that has the following cash flow and WACC data. What is the project\'s NPV? Note that if a project\'s projected NPV is negative, it should be rejected. WACC: 14.75% Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 Cash flows -$1,000 $300 $300 $300 $300 $300 A. $10.58 B. $13.02 C. $11.63 D. $9.07 E. $10.12 You can also get answer on onlinesolutionproviders com thanks
IRR VS NPV?
IRR: Internal rate return NPV: Net present value Both are measure of the viability of a project(s) You can have multiple IRR (because of discontinued cash flows) but you always have one NPV.
Which one of the following indicates that a project is expected to create value for its owners?
Positive NPV
When Projects are mutually exclusive which project should be selected using npv and risk level?
Problems with project ranking: 1. Mutually exclusive projects of unequal size (the size disparity problem) - the NPVdecision may not agree with the IRR or PI. Solution: select the project with the larges NPV (not IRR). 2. The time disparity problem with mutually exclusive projects - NPV and PI assume cash flows are reinvested at the required rate of return for the project. IRR assumes cash flows are reinvested at the IRR. NPV decision may not agree with the IRR. Solution: select the project with the largest NPV. A good method to evaluate and rank project better is to use the Equivalent Annual Annuity (EAA) method. This is like calculating for PMT when doing TVM. It simply means, you will be getting that amount as an inflow each year or period. Therefore, you would want to choose the highest figure.
What if your firm is considering a project that will cost 4.55 million upfront generate cash flows of 5 million per year for three years and then have a cleanup and shutdown cost of 6 million in the f?
Your firm is considering a project that will cost $4.55 million upfront, generate cash flows of $5 million per year for three years, and then have a cleanup and shutdown cost of $6 million in the fourth year. Assume a discount rate of 10% per annum, what is the NPV of this project? a. None of the other answers are true. b. The NPV of this project is $3.44 million. c. The NPV of this project is $3.34 million. d. The NPV of this project is $10.89 million.
Should the Dixon Corporation buy the Collingsville plant?
Yes they should but only if they go ahead with the laminate technology investment. The value of the plant on its own is a negative NPV project based on a WACC of between 16-17%, which is where it should be. This is possibly why the price asked for the sale of Collinsville by ACC is 12 million. It could be argued that they have inclued some of the benefits of there R&D of the laminate into the asking price hence a negative NPV for the plant alone.
If the interest rate is 5 percent what is the present value of a security that pays you 1100 next year and 1210 the year after would you be willing to pay 2310 for this security why or why not?
The NPV of this security is calculated as follows: (2310) + 1100/1.05 + 1210/1.05^2 = (164.87) Since the NPV of this investment is negative, you should not buy it.
Why is npv better than irr?
NPV measures the return a project generates against the costs borne to generate them, while also considering Time Value of Money. Whereas IRR measures returns alone and is hence seen as a myopic metric. NPV will be positive only when the IRR>WACC (i.e. the returns are more than the costs). The concept of IRR being greater than WACC is also called 'Positive EVA'. Needless to say, a project must be selected when NPV > 0! When choosing between projects, the spread between IRR & WACC will determine the financial feasibility ...the higher the better.
