Because of gun crime. The Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed after the assassinations of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. It banned the sale of firearms to people who had been convicted, diagnosed with mental illness or dismissed from the army.
It wasn't. Gun control in the United States actually dates back much further, and has a bit of a darker history than gun control advocates would lead you to believe. One of the major institutions of gun control was rooted in the Black Codes of Reconstruction era America, and one of the very few things Michael Moore actually got right on the subject was that the first gun control law was to prohibit blacks from being able to own a gun.
Gun control has EVERYTHING to do with the 2nd amendment; it's why the amendment was written in the first place!!!!!
No, because Hitler didn't announce gun control. His 1938 gun laws actually de-regulated many of the guns control laws put in place under the Weimar Republic. I can find no historical record of Hitler making a public announcement about these laws, let alone surrounded by children.
The Second Amendment has been selectively re-interpreted over the last 100 years or so, but not even the most fervent NRA member believes that it prohibits ANY gun control laws. Most people believe that gun control laws banning convicted criminals from owning firearms are completely reasonable. Gun opponents argue that all guns are dangerous and should be banned, while gun supporters believe that law-abiding citizens have a right to own guns. The plain text of the Second Amendment is pretty clear. The recent "Heller" Supreme Court decision, and the current case of the Chicago gun bans have changed the outlook for gun control laws, and we won't know what the end result will be for some years.
fewer restrictions on gun control
Yes, Adolf Hitler was a strong supporter of gun control. An Act in 1938 banned Jews from carrying weapons, and required anyone else to undergo a strict licencing process. After the War, gun ownership was banned completely for 11 years (even police officers could not carry guns while the country was being reconstructed).
If you are "pro" in the gun control debate, you are for less gun control. In other words, you are "pro-gun".
It started with people wanting to keep guns away from Indians and slaves.
There is no "gun control" amendment.
opposing.Versus, contra, counter"I am against gun control" could also be phrased "I'm opposed to gun control", "I'm anti-gun control", "I'm an opponent of gun control", "I disagree with the idea of gun control"
Gun Control
for an intruduction i would say something like "When dealin with guns it is key to maintain the control on this leathal weapon. inproper use can lead to great conciquenses but proper gun control can keep you away from the bad things like accidental shootings and such because you know how to use this helpful tool. Gun control is the way to go and this paragraph will explain the proper ways to handling a gun." or you can go in another direction but this is a good start i would think. :D
They have gun laws. Whether they actually have the words "gun control" within any of their firearms legislature, I don't know, but they do have gun control.
Yes, Ross Perot is for gun control. He was not a typical Conservative and was pro gun control and pro choice.
It is extremely anti-gun control.
A person against gun control. A pro-gun advocate. A pro-2A advocate (in the US).
type into google gun control usa.
Depends on WHICH gun control legislation you mean. In the US, there are already several thousand "gun control" laws on the books. However, they do not work. They DO keep honest people from being able to defend themselves from criminals.