The U.S. should not give foreign aid. When we attacked Hiroshima what did we do next? We rebuilt them, why? To allow them to attack us again of course.
India is its own country, why send so much money to a foreign place that doesn't seem to get any better, when the streets and slums of the U.S. could use the money better?
The U.S. should not give foreign aid. When we attacked Hiroshima what did we do next? We rebuilt them, why? To allow them to attack us again of course. India is its own country, why send so much money to a foreign place that doesn't seem to get any better, when the streets and slums of the U.S. could use the money better?
no, only the president was granted that.
to fund their production of muskrats
I THINK SHE SHOULD FOR ONCES INVITE PEPOLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES ON HER SHOW LIKE AFRICAINS, MEXICIANS AND SO MANY OTHER COUNTRIES I THINK SHE SHOULD FOR ONCES INVITE PEPOLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES ON HER SHOW LIKE AFRICAINS, MEXICIANS AND SO MANY OTHER COUNTRIES
Yes, South Koreans are a very giving people. They are also very involved in foreign affairs and making a difference for the world.
In my opinion we should keep troops in other countries because some troops get to see other places in the world. Also we can help one another. For example if we have troops in South Korea and North Korea attacks we can always help them if we have someone attack us then they can also help us. That would also give us more peace in the world.
To be an isolationist is, to put it bluntly, to not get involved in anyone's business other than your own. An isolationist country doesn't enter into treaties or alliances with other countries, and it doesn't get involved in other countries' wars. It stays away from foreign affairs as much as possible.
Yes, Germany does give financial assistance to other EU countries.
Lower production costs help lure foreign
Lower production costs help lure foreign investment.
Lower production costs help lure foreign investment.
Canada gives millions of dollars to developing country's.