Because zero is not needed in Roman numerals as the positional place value of these numerals are self evident.
8 = VIII (there is no Roman numeral for zero).
The Roman Numeral system did not have a way to represent zero.
there is no roman numeral for itAnother answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
The zero symbol as a Roman numeral is N but it was never needed
there is no zero in roman numerals
No Roman numeral exists for zero.
8 = VIII (there is no Roman numeral for zero).
The Roman Numeral system did not have a way to represent zero.
zero
there is no roman numeral for itAnother answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
The zero symbol as a Roman numeral is N but it was never needed
There is no Roman numeral zero.
there is no zero in roman numerals
The Roman numeral system is decimal but not directly positional and does not include a zero.
No, the number 0 does not have a corresponding Roman numeral. Roman numerals were developed by the ancient Romans and do not include a representation for the concept of zero.
the roman numeral system
A zero symbol